ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2219

Remaining Pain in DMARD-Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Baricitinib and Methotrexate

Yvonne C. Lee1, Paul Emery2, John D. Bradley3, Baojin Zhu3, Carol L Gaich3, Zhihong Cai4, Amanda Quebe3, Anabela Cardoso3, Yun-Fei Chen3 and Roy Fleischmann5, 1Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan, 5University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK), pain and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Pain – Basic and Clinical Aspects Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Patient (pt)-reported pain is common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), even in pts with good disease control1.  This analysis evaluated pain control achieved by methotrexate (MTX), baricitinib (BARI), or combination of baricitinib+MTX (BARI+MTX) in DMARD-naive RA pts from a Phase 3 study, RA-BEGIN2.

Methods:

Pts were randomized and treated with MTX (N=210), BARI (4 mg QD, N=159), or BARI+MTX (N=215). Pain intensity was assessed on a 0-100 mm visual-analog scale (VAS).  Percentage of pts reporting improvement in pain of ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥70% was evaluated, and time to achieve these improvements was assessed with the cumulative incidence estimate3.  Between-group comparisons of pain improvement (≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥70%) and percentage achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission were made using logistic models. Pain improvement among pts achieving remission (CDAI ≤2.8) or LDA (CDAI ≤10) was assessed relative to thresholds for ‘remaining’ pain (pain VAS ≤10 mm, ≤20 mm, or ≤40 mm) at Week 24.

Results:

The mean (SD) baseline pain VAS for MTX, BARI, and BARI+MTX were 65.2 (24.1), 64.1 (21.6), and 62.6 (22.6), which improved to 35.2 (26.2), 24.2 (22.2), and 23.8 (23.0) at Week 24, respectively.  BARI and BARI+MTX resulted in more pain improvement (-40.8 and -41.2, respectively, p<0.001) than MTX (-30.0). The percentage of pts reaching ≥70% pain improvement by Week 24 was 32.7% for MTX, 50.0% for BARI (p≤0.001 vs. MTX), and 50.5% for BARI+MTX (p≤0.001 vs. MTX). The time when 50% of pts achieved 70% pain improvement was 20 weeks for MTX, 12 weeks for BARI and 8 weeks for BARI+MTX, respectively. The cumulative incidence for achieving 70% improvement is shown (Fig). BARI and BARI+MTX demonstrated similar pain improvement responses. The percentage of pts achieving remission at Week 24 was higher for BARI (21%) and BARI+MTX (22%) compared to MTX (11%)2. Similarly, the percentage of pts achieving LDA was higher for BARI (60%) and BARI+MTX (59%) compared to MTX (39%).2 Mean pain VAS at Week 24 was 6.9 and 16.8, respectively, for pooled patients in remission and LDA. Across treatment groups, the percentage of pts achieving ≤10, ≤20 or ≤40 mm remaining pain by remission and LDA are presented in the Table.

Conclusion:

More pts treated with BARI or BARI+MTX had greater levels of pain improvement more rapidly compared to MTX. Pts treated with BARI or BARI+MTX were more likely to achieve remission and LDA. Patients achieving remission had less remaining pain than those in LDA.

References:

1 Altawil, et al Arthritis Care Res 2016

2 Fleischmann, et al Arthritis Rheumatol 2017

3 Gooley TA Statist Med 1999

 

 


Disclosure: Y. C. Lee, Express Scripts, 1,Pfizer Inc, 2; P. Emery, Pfizer,MSD,Abbvie,BMS,UCB,Roche,Novartis,Samsung, Sandoz, Eli Lilly and Company, 5; J. D. Bradley, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; B. Zhu, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; C. L. Gaich, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; Z. Cai, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; A. Quebe, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; A. Cardoso, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; Y. F. Chen, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; R. Fleischmann, AbbVie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca , Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee YC, Emery P, Bradley JD, Zhu B, Gaich CL, Cai Z, Quebe A, Cardoso A, Chen YF, Fleischmann R. Remaining Pain in DMARD-Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Baricitinib and Methotrexate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/remaining-pain-in-dmard-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-baricitinib-and-methotrexate/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/remaining-pain-in-dmard-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-baricitinib-and-methotrexate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology