ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • 2026 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 117

Reliability of Pediatric-Specific Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Scanning Protocol for the Detection of Arthritis

Ysabella Esteban1, Pinar Avar-Aydin2, Jackeline Rodriguez-Smith3, Jean-Philippe Proulx-Gauthier4, Heather Benham5, Clara Lin6, Matthew Clark7, Deirdre DeRanieri8, Emily Brunner9, Edward oberle10, Michael Henrickson11, Amy Cassedy12, Tracy Ting13 and Patricia Vega-Fernandez13, 1Divsion of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TR, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 4CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada., 5Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX, USA, North Richland Hills, TX, 6Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA, 7Prisma Health Children's Hospital Upstate, 8Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA, Chicago, IL, 9Department of Pediatrics, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA, Chicago, IL, 10Divsion of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA, Columbus, OH, 11Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA., 12Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA, Cincinnati, OH, 13Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, March 20, 2026

Title: Abstracts: Pediatric Rheumatology Potpourri

Session Time: 4:49PM-4:54PM

Background/Purpose: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is a diagnostic and interventional tool for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Various workgroups (WG) have proposed MSUS scanning and scoring protocols to quantify JIA disease activity, including the Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) WG. The CARRA pediatric-specific scoring systems (PAUSS) has good-to-excellent interrater reliability for the knee, elbow, wrist, finger, and ankle. The knee- and ankle-PAUSS have excellent accuracy for synovitis detection when compared to contrast-enhanced MRI.
While previous work assessed the PAUSS reliability, there are no published studies on scanning protocol reliability. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of the pediatric joint-specific scanning protocols proposed by the CARRA MSUS WG.

Methods: This IRB-approved study had 2 parts: scanning sessions and image scoring.
Scanning sessions. Sonographers included seven certified rheumatologist-sonographers, with post-training experience ranging from 1 to >10 years. Recruited patients with JIA were ≤ 18 years-old with at least 1 active joint based on recent physical examination by a rheumatologist. ILAR classification was used for JIA subtypes.
Sonographers reviewed the scanning protocols and were blinded to patient JIA subtype and disease activity.  The same ultrasound machines were used, with standardized grayscale (B-mode) and power doppler (PD) mode settings. Sonographers obtained paired (B- and PD-mode) still images from each patient for 4-6 predetermined active and normal joints.
Image scoring.  Eleven blinded rheumatologist-sonographers (raters) then scored the images using PAUSS. Using 117 paired images, a calibration exercise to assess inter-rater reliability was performed prior to formal scoring and showed excellent reliability [intra-class correlation (ICC) ≥0.80].
Statistical Analysis. The scanning protocol reliabilities were assessed by evaluating the ICC among raters for the same image/patient, defined as follows: 0.75 – 1.00 = excellent, 0.60 – 0.74 = good, 0.40 – 0.59 = fair, and < 0.4 = poor. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was included.

Results: Table 1 summarizes the demographics of the 10 JIA patients. A total of 365 joints were scanned; 1657 paired images acquired. The inter-rater reliability of the scoring protocol was excellent [ICC 0.88 (0.97 – 0.89)].  The scanning protocol reliability for all joints was excellent [ICC 0.89, 95% CI (0.89 – 0.90)] (Table 2).  The knee and ankle joints had excellent ICC, while finger tendons had the lowest ICC. The ICC for each view was determined to further evaluate the reliability of the scanning protocol (Table 3).  

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the reliability of the CARRA MSUS scanning protocol, demonstrating good to excellent reliability for the knee, ankle, wrist, and finger joints. The findings highlight the opportunity to further standardize sonographic evaluation of the wrist and finger tendons. This study supports the use of the CARRA PAUSS as an instrument for the assessment of disease activity and potential JIA outcome measure.

Demographics of Patient ParticipantsSupporting image 1Demographics of participating patients. Patient ages ranged from 8 years-old to 18 years-old. Using the ILAR criteria, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) subtypes included psoriatic, RF-negative polyarticular, enthesitis-related, and undifferentiated

Scanning Protocol Reliability: ICC for Joints and TendonsSupporting image 2Evaluation of the scanning protocol reliability for all joints and each joint area using the ICC for the PAUSS scoring system. ICC = intra-class correlation: 0.75 – 1.00 = excellent, 0.60 – 0.74 = good, 0.40 – 0.59 = fair, and < 0.4 = poor.

Scanning Protocol Reliability: ICC for Specific Joint and Tendon ViewsSupporting image 3Evaluation of the scanning protocol and sonographer reliability specific joint views using the ICC for the PAUSS scoring system. ICC = intra-class correlation: 0.75 – 1.00 = excellent, 0.60 – 0.74 = good, 0.40 – 0.59 = fair, and < 0.4 = poor. *Refers to views use to evaluate for tendon pathology


Disclosures: Y. Esteban: None; P. Avar-Aydin: None; J. Rodriguez-Smith: None; J. Proulx-Gauthier: None; H. Benham: None; C. Lin: None; M. Clark: None; D. DeRanieri: None; E. Brunner: None; E. oberle: None; M. Henrickson: None; A. Cassedy: None; T. Ting: None; P. Vega-Fernandez: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Esteban Y, Avar-Aydin P, Rodriguez-Smith J, Proulx-Gauthier J, Benham H, Lin C, Clark M, DeRanieri D, Brunner E, oberle E, Henrickson M, Cassedy A, Ting T, Vega-Fernandez P. Reliability of Pediatric-Specific Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Scanning Protocol for the Detection of Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026; 78 (suppl 3). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reliability-of-pediatric-specific-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-scanning-protocol-for-the-detection-of-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reliability-of-pediatric-specific-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-scanning-protocol-for-the-detection-of-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to PRYSM are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 6:00 PM CT on March 18. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology