ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2883

Relationship Between Improvements in Fatigue and Signs & Symptoms of Active Psoriatic: Arthritis a Sub-Analysis of a Phase 3 Study with Secukinumab

Laure Gossec1, Tore K. Kvien2, Philip G. Conaghan3, Mikkel Østergaard4, Juan D. Cañete5, C. Gaillez6, Shephard Mpofu6, Bintu Sherif7 and Steffen Jugl8, 1Rheumatology Department, Paris 06 University,Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 2Dept of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3University of Leeds & NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark, 5Rheumatology, Hospital Clinic and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain, 6Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 7RTI Health Solutions, Durham, NC, 8BF I&D GPA, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Fatigue, interleukins (IL), monoclonal antibodies, psoriatic arthritis and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Fatigue is highly important to patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, significantly improved the signs and symptoms of active PsA in the phase 3 FUTURE 2 study (NCT01752634).1Here we present the results of a post-hoc analysis assessing the impact of secukinumab on fatigue according to prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy status. The relationship between fatigue and baseline disease characteristics, as well as to other assessments of PsA response to therapy, are also presented.

Methods: Pts with active PsA were randomized to receive subcutaneous (s.c.) secukinumab (300 mg, 150 mg, or 75 mg) or placebo (PBO) at baseline, Wks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and every 4 wks thereafter. Fatigue was assessed at baseline and Wks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale. Mean change in FACIT-F score from baseline up to Wk 24 was assessed using mixed model repeated measures analysis with visit, weight, and baseline FACIT-F score as covariates. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) >4 was used to define fatigue response. A logistic regression model was used to investigate baseline predictors of FACIT-F improvement at Wk 16. The relationship between FACIT-F and ACR 20, PASI 75, PASI 90, DAS28-CRP low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 3.2) and remission (< 2.6), and Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) was assessed at Wks 8 and 16. The secukinumab 75 mg s.c. group was excluded from this analysis as it did not meet any pre-defined secondary endpoints.

Results:  Of 298 pts included in this analysis, 193 were anti–TNF-naive and 105 anti–TNF-inadequate responders (IR). Mean changes from baseline in FACIT-F were improved with secukinumab 150 and 300 mg vs. placebo in both anti-TNF-naïve and anti-TNF-IR populations at the majority of timepoints up to Wk 24 with mean changes exceeding the MCID at all timepoints (Table). In a logistic regression model of FACIT-F response at Wk 16, age was the only baseline factor found to be a significant covariate (P<0.05). ACR 20 responses correlated with improvements in FACIT-F at Wk 16; no relationship was seen between FACIT-F and PASI 75, PASI 90, DAS28-CRP, LDA and remission criteria, or PsARC. 

Conclusion: Secukinumab improved fatigue in patients with active PsA regardless of prior anti-TNF therapy. A relationship between improvement in fatigue and improvements in the signs and symptoms of PsA was only shown for ACR 20 response and not for other assessments of disease. These results suggest that fatigue in PsA is not strongly related to disease activity but was still improved by secukinumab.

References:

  1. McInnes IB, et al. ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA. November 14–19, 2014. Oral Presentation L1.

Table: Mean changes in FACIT-F in anti–TNF-naïve and anti–TNF-IR patients up to Week 24

Mean (± SD) Change from Baseline

(p-value vs. placebo)

Week 4

Week 8

Week 12

Week 16

Week 24

Anti–TNF-naïve

Secukinumab 300 mg (N = 67)

–4.42 ± 0.94

(0.2)

–5.14 ± 1.04

(0.047)

–5.51 ± 1.09

(0.02)

–6.18 ± 1.10

(0.009)

–5.13 ± 1.15

(0.098)

Secukinumab

150 mg (N = 63)

–5.51 ± 0.94

(0.04)

–5.72 ± 1.04

(0.02)

–7.67 ± 1.09

(0.0003)

–7.90 ± 1.11

(0.0003)

–8.17 ± 1.16

(0.001)

Placebo (N = 63)

–2.79 ± 0.93

–2.20 ± 1.05

–1.97 ± 1.10

–2.00 ± 1.13

–1.98 ± 1.50

Anti–TNF-IR

Secukinumab

150 mg (N = 37)

–5.44 ± 1.25

(0.2)

–7.45 ± 1.40

(0.01)

–8.45 ± 1.52

(0.05)

–7.25 ± 1.63

(0.03)

–8.26 ± 1.60

(0.03)

Secukinumab

300 mg (N = 33)

–5.28 ± 1.33

(0.2)

–7.23 ± 1.47

(0.02)

–7.36 ± 1.61

(0.2)

–6.22 ± 1.73

(0.09)

–8.25 ± 1.68

(0.03)

Placebo (N = 35)

–3.10 ± 1.28

–2.25 ± 1.42

–4.07 ± 1.59

–2.05 ± 1.73

–2.23 ± 2.15


Disclosure: L. Gossec, UCB Pharma, 2,AbbVie, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,Celgene, 5,Chugai, 5,Janssen, 5,Novartis, 5,Pfizer, 5,Roche, 5,UCB Pharma, 5,OMERACT Executive Commitee, 6; T. K. Kvien, AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, 2,AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Merck-Serono, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz and UCB, 5; P. G. Conaghan, Abbvie, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, and UCB, 5,Abbvie, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, and UCB, 8; M. Østergaard, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Centocor, GSK, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Schering-Plough, Roche, Takeda, UCB, and Wyeth, 5,Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Centocor, GSK, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Schering-Plough, Roche, Takeda, UCB, and Wyeth, 2; J. D. Cañete, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Pfizer, 5; C. Gaillez, Novartis Pharma AG, 3,Novartis Pharma AG, 1; S. Mpofu, Novartis AG, 3,Novartis AG, 1; B. Sherif, RTI Health Solutions, NC, USA, 3; S. Jugl, Novartis Pharma AG, 3,Novartis Pharma AG, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gossec L, Kvien TK, Conaghan PG, Østergaard M, Cañete JD, Gaillez C, Mpofu S, Sherif B, Jugl S. Relationship Between Improvements in Fatigue and Signs & Symptoms of Active Psoriatic: Arthritis a Sub-Analysis of a Phase 3 Study with Secukinumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationship-between-improvements-in-fatigue-and-signs-symptoms-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-sub-analysis-of-a-phase-3-study-with-secukinumab/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationship-between-improvements-in-fatigue-and-signs-symptoms-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-sub-analysis-of-a-phase-3-study-with-secukinumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology