ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2184

Relation of Gait Speed to Incident Knee Replacement: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

Joshua Stefanik1, Jodie McClelland2, Carrie Brown3, Michael P. LaValley3, James Torner4, Michael Nevitt5, Cora E. Lewis6 and Tuhina Neogi1, 1Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Latrobe University, Melbourne, Australia, 3Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 4University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 5Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, 6University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Gait and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster II: Observational and Epidemiological Studies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: For some individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA), the failure of conservative management can often lead to knee replacement (KR). Identifying who will progress to KR may allow efficient dedication of resources towards this group with interventions that may delay or prevent the need for surgery. To date, self-reported pain severity and function has not provided sufficient prediction of KR. The speed of a person’s gait is a powerful predictor of significant health events in older adults. Gait speed may encapsulate a range of functional limitations and impairments that could precipitate the need for KR and may therefore be an appropriate measure that predicts the need for KR in patients with knee OA. At the same time, because KRs occur in older individuals, observational studies need to properly account for competing risk of death and study withdrawal to obtain valid estimates of risk of KR. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation of gait speed to incident KR in older individuals with or at risk for knee OA.

Methods: The MOST Study is a NIH-funded cohort of persons with or at risk of knee OA. MOST participants completed baseline, 30-, 60-, and 84-month clinic visits. Gait speed at the baseline clinic visit was calculated from the time taken to complete the 20-meter walk test (meters(m)/second(s)). Date of first KR was confirmed. Participants without a KR were censored at their last attended clinic visit. We examined the relation of gait speed to KR using a Cox proportional hazards model accounting for competing events. Participants without a KR were censored at their 84-month visit, and death and early withdrawals were considered competing events. In separate models, we dichotomized gait speed at values related to functional limitation and community walking speed (1.0 and 1.2 m/s, respectively), and also into tertiles. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, clinic site, baseline knee pain severity (visual analog scale 0-100 in the most painful knee) and baseline Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score (maximum of right and left).

Results: 2774 participants were included: mean±SD age, BMI, and gait speed were 62.3±8.0, 30.6±6.0, and 1.20±0.2, respectively; 60% were female. 47% and 15% of participants walked at 1.0 and 1.2 m/s at baseline, respectively. While lower gait speeds were associated with higher risk of KR in the crude model, once we accounted for the confounding effects of pain severity and the competing risk of death and study withdrawal, lower gait speeds were no longer associated with incident KR (Table). Compared with the highest gait speed tertile, those in the lowest had 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) times the risk of KR.

Conclusion: Gait speed was not a strong predictor of KR once we accounted for the confounding effects of pain and competing risk of death and study withdrawal.

Hazard Ratio (95% CI) for KR (n=2774)

Crude

Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, clinic site,

KL score, and knee pain severity

20-m walk <1.0 m/s

2.1

(1.7, 2.5)

1.0

(0.8, 1.3)

20-m walk <1.2 m/s

2.2

(1.8, 2.7)

1.1

(0.8, 1.4)

20-m walk (range)

Lowest Tertile (0.2-1.13)

Middle Tertile (1.14-1.29)

Highest Tertile (1.3-1.9)

3.0 (2.3-3.8)

1.7 (1.3-2.2)

1.0 (ref)

1.2 (0.9-1.6)

1.2 (0.9-1.5)

1.0 (ref)


Disclosure: J. Stefanik, None; J. McClelland, None; C. Brown, None; M. P. LaValley, None; J. Torner, None; M. Nevitt, None; C. E. Lewis, None; T. Neogi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stefanik J, McClelland J, Brown C, LaValley MP, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Neogi T. Relation of Gait Speed to Incident Knee Replacement: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-gait-speed-to-incident-knee-replacement-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-gait-speed-to-incident-knee-replacement-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology