ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 423

Refractory Pain in Spite of Inflammation Control after Start of Anti-TNF Therapy in RA: Observational Data from Southern Sweden

Tor Olofsson1, Johan K Wallman2, Maria EC Schelin3, Anna Jöud4 and Jon Lampa5, 1Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 2Department of Clincial Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 3Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 4Lund University, Department of Laboratory Medicine Lund, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 5Karolinska Institute, Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Epidemiologic methods, pain and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pain is a dominant and debilitating feature of RA, but while a lot of focus has been put on the occurrence and management of inflammatory pain, less is reported on pain despite low inflammation. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the prevalence of refractory pain in spite of inflammation control after start of a first anti-TNF therapy in RA patients and its relation to EULAR treatment response.

Methods: RA patients starting a first anti-TNF therapy 2004-2010 were identified in the prospective, observational South Swedish Arthritis Group register (n=1166; 76% women; >95% fulfillment of 1987 ACR criteria) with mean age 56 years and mean disease duration 10 years. Unacceptable pain (>40 mm on a Visual Analogue Scale, VAS; scale 0-100 mm)1 and unacceptable pain in spite of inflammation control (VAS pain>40 mm combined with CRP<10 mg/L,2 and ≤1 swollen joint) were assessed 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment start. Furthermore, analyses were performed in relation to EULAR treatment response after 3 months (good response, moderate, no). Differences in pain measures between treatment response groups were estimated by logistic regression.

Results: At start of first anti-TNF therapy, 79.6% of the RA patients had unacceptable pain (VAS pain>40) which declined to 39.8% after 3 months, and then remained stable during the first treatment year, whereas the frequency of patients with unacceptable pain in spite of inflammation control increased from 4.0% at treatment start to 12.3% after 3 months, and then stabilized (Figure 1). Unacceptable pain at 3 months was strongly related to EULAR response (14.1% of good responders vs. 70.5% of non-responders; p<0.001). In contrast, the frequency of unacceptable pain in spite of inflammation control was largely similar in patients with good response and those with no response (10.9% vs. 14.4%; p=0.23). Among EULAR good responders, unacceptable pain despite inflammation control constituted 78% of all unacceptable pain at 3 months (Figure 2).

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of RA patients starting anti-TNF therapy have refractory, unacceptable pain in spite of good inflammation control during the first treatment year. In the present study, this pain status was as common in EULAR good responders as in non-responders. These data are in line with insufficient effects of biologics on a subgroup of patients with inflammation-independent pain, and strongly warrants alternative treatment strategies in these patients.

 

 

    1) Tubach et al. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:1699-72. 2) Lourdudoss et al. Arthritis Care Res 2017 doi 10.1002/acr.23245


Disclosure: T. Olofsson, None; J. K. Wallman, Abbvie, Celgene, Novartis, UCB, 5; M. E. Schelin, None; A. Jöud, None; J. Lampa, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Olofsson T, Wallman JK, Schelin ME, Jöud A, Lampa J. Refractory Pain in Spite of Inflammation Control after Start of Anti-TNF Therapy in RA: Observational Data from Southern Sweden [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/refractory-pain-in-spite-of-inflammation-control-after-start-of-anti-tnf-therapy-in-ra-observational-data-from-southern-sweden/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/refractory-pain-in-spite-of-inflammation-control-after-start-of-anti-tnf-therapy-in-ra-observational-data-from-southern-sweden/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology