ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2042

Referral Criteria to an Early Arthritis Clinic: Poor Agreement between Referring Physicians and Rheumatologists

Filipa Farinha1,2, Gisela Eugénio2, Mary Marques2, Francisco Freitas3, José António P. da Silva2,4 and Cátia Duarte2,4, 1Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, E.P.E., Aveiro, Portugal, 2Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 3Centre for Social Studies, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 4Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Referrals and inflammatory arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Prompt identification and referral of patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis to a rheumatology clinic are crucial for early diagnosis and treatment. In the referral letter to our Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC), the physician should refer, out from seven possible criteria, the ones motivating the referral. The objectives of our study were: 1) to assess the level of agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist, regarding the presence of referral criteria; 2) to identify the set of criteria that best predicts the presence of inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: Unicentric retrospective observational study, including patients observed in the EAC until May/2016. Subjects were excluded if they had been referred to the EAC by a rheumatologist and if we couldn´t access the referral letter or the medical records from the first visit to the EAC. Demographic data, provenience, referral criteria and the final diagnosis were retrieved from individual clinical files and the Portuguese Registry of Rheumatic Patients – Reuma.pt. For the referral criteria, the agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist in the first EAC visit, was assessed using the Cohen’s Kappa. In the second step, we created four new variables, each one corresponding to a set of criteria, as indicated by the referring physician. ROC curves were drawn by a nonparametric method in order to identify the set that best predicts the presence of inflammatory arthritis.

Results: We included 132 patients, 66% females, mean age 52±17 years; Referred from primary care (72%), emergency department (17%) and other hospital specialties (11%). An inflammatory arthritis was diagnosed in 73% of the cases.  Table 1 shows the level of agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist, regarding the presence of each of the referral criteria. Table 2 shows the area under the curve for each set of criteria.

Conclusion: Among the clinical criteria, there was poor agreement regarding the presence of arthritis and no significant agreement regarding the characterization of the arthralgia as inflammatory, the morning stiffness and the squeeze test. The weak performance of all sets of criteria in predicting inflammatory arthritis is probably due to deficient recognition of each criterium. These results suggest the need for improving education among the physicians referring patients to the EAC.

Table 1: Agreement between the referring physician and the rheumatologist, regarding the presence of each of seven criteria.

Referral criteria

N Ref/Rheum

kappa

CI 95%

p

Arthritis (N=122)

83/82

0.23

0.05-0.41

0.01

Squeeze (N=80)

23/36

0.03

-0.17-0.24

0.75

Inflammatory arthralgia (N=131)

95/112

-0.01

-0.17-0.15

0.90

Morning stiffness > 30′ (N=107)

51/80

0.01

-0.02-0.30

0.09

Rheumatoid Factors (N=117)

31/27

0.59

0.42-0.76

0.00

Elevated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (N=125)

63/65

0.33

0.16-0.49

0.00

Elevated C reactive Protein (N=124)

60/74

0.30

0.13-0.46

0.00

Table 2: Area under the curve for each set of criteria, as indicated by the referring physician.

Set of criteria

AUC

CI 95%

p

All_Criteria

0.577

0.478 – 0.677

0.177

Clinical_Criteria

0.465

0.356 – 0.574

0.543

Clinical+ESR+CRP_Criteria

0.544

0.442 – 0.647

0.439

Arthritis+Lab_Criteria

0.677

0.583 – 0.771

0.002

 


Disclosure: F. Farinha, None; G. Eugénio, None; M. Marques, None; F. Freitas, None; J. A. P. da Silva, None; C. Duarte, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Farinha F, Eugénio G, Marques M, Freitas F, da Silva JAP, Duarte C. Referral Criteria to an Early Arthritis Clinic: Poor Agreement between Referring Physicians and Rheumatologists [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/referral-criteria-to-an-early-arthritis-clinic-poor-agreement-between-referring-physicians-and-rheumatologists/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/referral-criteria-to-an-early-arthritis-clinic-poor-agreement-between-referring-physicians-and-rheumatologists/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology