ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0556

Recent Use, Missed Doses and Discontinuation of Infliximab in New-users: Comparisons of Biosimilar and Originator Exposures

Cristiano Moura1, Jeffrey R Curtis2, Denis Choquette3, Gilles Boire4, Vivian Bykerk5, Carter Thorne6, Walter Maksymowych7, Peter Lakatos1, Larry Svenson8, Laura Targownik5, Waqqas Afif1 and Sasha Bernatsky9, 1McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 2Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada, 4Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada, 5University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 6Ontario Rheumatology Association, Aurora, Canada, 7University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 8University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 9The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Administrative Data, Biologicals, infliximab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster II: OA, Osteoporosis, & Other Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Biosimilar infliximab offers a potentially lower‐cost treatment option compared to its bio‐originator. However, uptake of biosimilars in general in North America has been slow. To describe new users of infliximab in the US, comparing biosimilar and bio-originator, in terms of missed doses and discontinuation.

Methods: We used from data Marketscan® Commercial Claims and Encounters and the Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases (January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2018). We studied adult individuals (age>18 years), who were infliximab-naïve (new users). The date of first infliximab claim was defined as the index date. We assessed i) first missed dose and, ii) occurrence of complete discontinuation. Missed dose was defined as any gap between infusions beyond recommended intervals (0, 2, and 6 weeks during the induction phase and 8 weeks in the maintenance phase). If there was no record of an infliximab infusion at the expected date of the next injection (plus a grace period of 7 days), a discontinuation event was assigned.

Results: In the new-user cohort there were 5,596 new users of infliximab, including 301 biosimilar users. Baseline characteristics of individuals included in the analysis are shown in Table 1. Among patients initiating treatment with infliximab biosimilar, 30.9% missed at least one scheduled infusion during the induction phase, similar to the percent (28.6%) among the originator infliximab users. After multivariable adjustment for age, sex, date of treatment initiation, medication use (other biologic medications, synthetic DMARDs, and corticosteroids), and underlying diseases, we were unable to detect if first missing dose in the induction phase differed between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.92-1.41). For patients completing the induction phase (n=3,282), 33.1% of biosimilar users missed at least one infusion within one year during the maintenance phase, which was not statistically different from the originator users (40.1%). The adjusted analysis showed no clear difference for first missed dose between groups (aHR = 0.94, 95% CI =0.71;1.24). Complete discontinuation in the maintenance phase (a gap more than 90 days beyond the expected infusion date without restarting therapy), was similar in the biosimilar group (13.1%) and originator group (15.5%). In adjusted analysis, we were unable to show significant difference among groups for complete discontinuation (aHR = 1.00, 95% CI =0.63;1.59)

Conclusion: Biosimilar infliximab use in the United Sates continues to be low over 2017-2018. In new users, we were unable to detect differences between biosimilar and bio-originator, in terms of missed doses and discontinuation.

Table 1 – Baseline characteristics of new users of infliximab biosimilar and infliximab originator, Marketscan, 2017-2018.


Disclosure: C. Moura, None; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Sanofi, 5; D. Choquette, AbbVie Canada, 5, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada, 5, 8, Eli Lilly Canada, 5, 8, Merk Canada, 5, 8, Novartis Canada, 5, 8, UCB Canada, 5, Janssen Canada, 5, Sandoz Canada, 5, 8, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, Roche Canada, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, 5, 8; G. Boire, Amgen, 1, 2, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Celgene, 1, Merck, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, Abbvie, 1, Novartis, 1, Sandoz, 1; V. Bykerk, None; C. Thorne, None; W. Maksymowych, AbbVie, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5; P. Lakatos, None; L. Svenson, None; L. Targownik, None; W. Afif, None; S. Bernatsky, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Moura C, Curtis J, Choquette D, Boire G, Bykerk V, Thorne C, Maksymowych W, Lakatos P, Svenson L, Targownik L, Afif W, Bernatsky S. Recent Use, Missed Doses and Discontinuation of Infliximab in New-users: Comparisons of Biosimilar and Originator Exposures [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/recent-use-missed-doses-and-discontinuation-of-infliximab-in-new-users-comparisons-of-biosimilar-and-originator-exposures/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/recent-use-missed-doses-and-discontinuation-of-infliximab-in-new-users-comparisons-of-biosimilar-and-originator-exposures/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology