ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 280

Reasons Why Patients Failed Vaccinations Vs Influenza and Pneumococcus. Monocentric Cross-Sectional Study.

Maria Chiara Ditto1, Alberto Batticciotto1, Maria Chiara Gerardi1, Federica Rigamonti2, Rossella Talotta1 and Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini1, 1Rheumatology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli - Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 2Rheumatology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli - Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic drugs, infection and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: immunosuppressive therapies and bDAMRDs expecially, increase the risk of infections. According to the EULAR guidelines, all patients affected by autoimmune/inflammatory diseases should receive vaccinations against influenza and pneumococcus. The primary aim of this work is to evaluate the prevalence of flu and pneumococcal vaccinations in a cohort of patients affected by inflammatory arthritides and SLE treated with biological drugs. The secondary aim was to explore the reason why patients do not receive vaccination.

Methods: we administered a self-reporting questionnaire about both flu and pneumococcal vaccination, to 274 consecutive patients from February to April 2017 treated with bDMARDs.

Results: the 65.3% of patients declared to have been informed from rheumatologist about the possibility to received vaccinations during biological treatments but the 19.5% declared to have never been informed about them. The 46% of patients vaccination for influenza was performed after rheumatology suggestion and the 21% after their general pratictioner suggestion, while the 30.1% has declared to have not performed it for several reasons: because concerned about adverse events (5.1%), beacause they don’t see it as useful (17.4%) or for other reasons. The injection has been administered for free in the majority of patients (GPs 36.8%, local healthcare 33.5%). The 60.9% would have undergone vaccination even for a fee. The anti pneumococcal vaccination was administered to the 25.3%, while to the 50.3% has never been suggested to do it. The 4.4% has declared to have not performed it because concerned about adverse events and the 6.6% because they don’t see it as useful. The injection has been administered for free at local healthcare facilities in the 84% of the patients. The 97.3% would have undergone vaccination even for a fee. At last the patients have declared to have always been well informed about vaccinations (48,9%), to have been well informed only about certain vaccinations (9,5%) or to have been informed only after asking (9,1%); The 19.1% was unsatisfied.

Conclusion: the acquired vaccine rate has been low for the influenza vaccination (<60%) and extremely low for the pneumococcal vaccination (26%). Even if the reasons of this results are partially attributable to a low patients’ compliance (47.5% for the influenza vaccination, 11% for the anti pneumococcical vaccination), almost 20% has declared not to have ever been informed about vaccinations. So an additional effort to improve these results is mandatory.


Disclosure: M. C. Ditto, None; A. Batticciotto, None; M. C. Gerardi, None; F. Rigamonti, None; R. Talotta, None; P. Sarzi-Puttini, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ditto MC, Batticciotto A, Gerardi MC, Rigamonti F, Talotta R, Sarzi-Puttini P. Reasons Why Patients Failed Vaccinations Vs Influenza and Pneumococcus. Monocentric Cross-Sectional Study. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reasons-why-patients-failed-vaccinations-vs-influenza-and-pneumococcus-monocentric-cross-sectional-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reasons-why-patients-failed-vaccinations-vs-influenza-and-pneumococcus-monocentric-cross-sectional-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology