ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 104

Reasons for Leaving an Academic Career in Research Among Rheumatologists in the United States

Alexis Ogdie1, Ami Shah2, Una Makris3, Alfred Kim4, Sheila Angeles-Han5, Amit Golding6, J. Michelle Kahlenberg7, Eyal Muscal8, Flavia V. Castelino9 and  Amanda Nelson10, 1Rheumatology and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Division of Rheumatology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Rheumatology, Dallas VA Medical Ctr, Dallas, TX, 4Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, 5Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 6Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Baltimore VA and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 7Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 8Rheumatology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, 9Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 105) Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology and Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: investigator, Research, research funding and rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Reasons for leaving an academic career in research among rheumatologists

Background/Purpose: Retention of academic rheumatologists in research careers is increasingly challenging in the current funding environment.  However, beyond funding, reasons for leaving a career in research remain unknown.  The objective of this study was to examine factors for leaving a career in research among rheumatologists.

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among the domestic ACR membership from Jan-Mar 2014.  Inclusion criteria were current or previous fellowship in rheumatology, ACR membership, and an available email address.  Non-rheumatologist members were excluded.   The survey assessed demographics, research participation, barriers/facilitators to a career in research, and free text response for reasons for leaving a career in research.  After excluding incomplete surveys and duplicates, demographics were summarized.  Content analysis was used to extract relevant themes from free text comments. 

Results: Ninety-seven respondents (among 430 complete responses) indicated that they had previously pursued a career in research but decided to switch career paths. This career change occurred a median of 10 years ago (interquartile range [IQR] 3-20) and a median of 7 years after completing fellowship (IQR 2-14).  Previous research types and current positions are presented in the Table. Approximately half of respondents were female.  The most commonly cited reasons for leaving a research career were difficulty obtaining funding and lack of department or division support (Table).  Among 27 free text comments, respondents noted additional reasons for leaving research including new opportunities in administration, teaching and clinical care, great clinical burden and insufficient protected time to be successful in research endeavors, increasing age, difficulty financially supporting a family, difficulty covering loans with low salary, need for increased job security, lack of mentorship, unsupportive environment or institution, need to move to a new geographic area without opportunities for research, and fear of having to move if not successful in obtaining funding or achieving tenure. When asked what would have kept these investigators in research, the most common responses included increased protected time and availability of internal grant funding mechanisms.   

Conclusion: This is the largest known study examining reasons for leaving a career in academic research.  While financial reasons were the most commonly cited reason for leaving a career in research, division support and protected time were similarly important.  These results suggest that enhancing institutional support of academic research in rheumatology should be an important emphasis in order to support and sustain research careers. 

Table: Participants who decided to leave a research career (N=97)

Female (N(%))

 

45 (46%)

Year of fellowship completion (median and IQR)

 

1993 (1983-2005)

Years Since Transition

(median and IQR)

 

10 (3-20)

Years after fellowship when transition occurred  (median and IQR)

 

7 (2-14)

Current Position

Adult Rheumatologist

78 (80%)

 

Pediatric Rheumatologist

14 (14%)

 

Adult Fellow

5 (5%)

 

Pediatric Fellow

0 (0%)

Current Place of Employment

Academic Medical Center

52 (54%)

 

Clinical Practice

24 (25%)

 

Industry

17 (18%)

 

Government

2 (2%)

 

Retired

2 (2%)

Academic Appointment

Instructor or other Junior Faculty

6 (6%)

 

Assistant Professor

14 (14%)

 

Associate Professor

21 (22%)

 

Professor

22 (23%)

 

Other (or no academic appointment)

34 (35%)

Previous Type of Research

Clinical

47 (48%)

 

Epidemiology/Health Services

8 (8%)

 

Translational

36 (37%)

 

Basic Science

49 (51%)

Factors Contributing to Decision to Leave

Difficulty obtaining grant funding

55 (57%)

Lack of division/department support

51 (53%)

 

Better compensation

38 (39%)

 

Lack of mentorship

38 (39%)

 

Tired of writing grants

33 (34%)

 

Personal reasons*

26 (27%)

 

Desire to spend more time in clinical care

20 (21%)

 

Exciting opportunities in industry

10 (10%)

 

Did not enjoy research work

6 (6%)

What would have retained you in a research career?

Provide internal grant funding mechanisms

54 (56%)

 

Increase protected time

50 (52%)

 

Increase income

31 (32%)

 

Increase work flexibility

25 (26%)

 

Provide greater leadership opportunities

25 (26%)

 

Nothing would have incentivized me to stay in academics

9 (9%)

*Personal reasons included desire to move geographically (N=16) or desire to spend more time with family (N=15).

 


Disclosure:

A. Ogdie,
None;

A. Shah,
None;

U. Makris,
None;

A. Kim,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Amgen,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Kypha, Inc.,

2;

S. Angeles-Han,
None;

A. Golding,
None;

J. M. Kahlenberg,
None;

E. Muscal,
None;

F. V. Castelino,
None;

Nelson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reasons-for-leaving-an-academic-career-in-research-among-rheumatologists-in-the-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology