ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2444

Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Biologic Therapies

Jessica Walsh1, Qian Cai 2, Timothy Fitzgerald 3, Christopher Pericone 2, Pankaj Shukla 4 and Soumya Chakravarty 5, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, 3Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 4Mu-Sigma, Chicago, IL, 5Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC; Drexel University College of Medicine, Horsham; Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics and infliximab, Psoriatic arthritis, real-world

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis, Clinical Features

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Though biologic therapies have demonstrated long-term response in randomized clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), such patient populations and settings may not reflect the general PsA population or real-life practice patterns, e.g., switching or adding therapies for patients with inadequately controlled symptoms. To better understand long-term patterns of biologic use for PsA treatment, this study aimed to describe 2-year adherence, persistence and switching among PsA patients initiated with adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab or secukinumab.

Methods: Adults with ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim for the above biologics during 1/1/2013 – 12/31/2016 were selected from Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The date of the first claim was the index date. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months pre-index and ≥ 24 months post-index continuous enrollment, with ≥2 PsA diagnoses ≥ 30 days apart during the 12-month pre-index through 12-month post-index period, and the first diagnosis occurring on or prior to the index date. Patients were excluded if they had ≥ 2 different biologics on the same day, a medical claim for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, other spondyloarthropathies, contraindications, or an index biologic filled during the 12-month pre-index period. Days’ supply from medical claims (14.8% of all claims) was imputed based on the most frequently observed days’ supply from pharmacy claims (84 days: ustekinumab; 28 or 30 days: other biologics). Baseline characteristics, adjunctive medication, number of patients who discontinued index biologic (ie, had a gap between fills of > 1.5 times the dispensed days’ supply(135 days for ustekinumab; 45 days for other biologics), and number of patients who switched to a different biologic were reported by index biologic.

Results: Of 1,109 patients included, mean (SD) age was 52.1 (12.8) years and 50.6% were female. The most common index biologics were adalimumab (43%) and etanercept (31%) [Fig 1]. During the 24-month follow-up period, 19.1% of patients persisted on their index biologic; ustekinumab had the highest persistence (27.2%) [Fig 2].The mean (SD) proportion of days covered (PDC) for index biologics was 0.47 (0.31). Of the 897 patients who discontinued their index biologic, 35.2% restarted the same biologic, 37.6% switched to a different biologic, and 33.6% discontinued without restarting or switching. The most common biologics that patients switched to were adalimumab (32%) and ustekinumab (18.4%) [Fig 3]. Of patients (n=864) who persisted with the index biologic for ≥ 90 days, 48.6% received ≥ 1 adjunctive medication during the period from 90 days post index to the end of persistence or 24 months, the most common were corticosteroids (27.7%), opioids (16.7%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (13.4%).

Conclusion: In this real-world study of biologic PsA therapies,  24-month persistence ranged from 15.4%-27.2%, with ustekinumab having the highest persistence. Of patients who persisted on their index biologic for >90 days, nearly half used adjunctive therapy.


Disclosure: J. Walsh, AbbVie, 2, 5, ABBVIE, NOVARTIS, LILLY, AMGEN, UCB, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, PFIZER, ABBVIE, 2, UCB, 5; Q. Cai, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; T. Fitzgerald, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, 3, 4; C. Pericone, Janssen Research & Development, LLC,, 3; P. Shukla, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; S. Chakravarty, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Walsh J, Cai Q, Fitzgerald T, Pericone C, Shukla P, Chakravarty S. Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Biologic Therapies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treatment-patterns-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-treated-with-biologic-therapies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treatment-patterns-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-treated-with-biologic-therapies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology