ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0738

Real World Steroid Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Rheumatologists’ Perceptions on Advanced Therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis

Anisha Dua1, Aditi Kadakia2, Patrick Zueger3, Simran Marwaha4, Nathaniel Zerad3, Arathi Setty3, William Jones4 and Valerie Devauchelle5, 1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 2AbbVie Inc, Woburn, MA, 3AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 4Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom, 5UBO, Brest, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, glucocorticoids, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0731–0764) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in patients 50 years and older. Glucocorticoids (GC) are the mainstay of treatment for GCA but can cause significant adverse events (AE). This study assessed GC burden, treatment patterns and rheumatologists’ perceptions of advanced therapies (AT) for GCA.

Methods: Data were from the Adelphi Real World GCA Disease Specific ProgrammeTM, a cross-sectional, retrospective survey of rheumatologists and their adult (≥18 years) patients with GCA in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU-5), and the United States (US) from 05/2024–10/2024. Rheumatologists completed patient record forms (PRF) for each patient to record demographics, treatment history and clinical characteristics. Rheumatologists were surveyed on their patient management approach and treatment perceptions. Patients for whom a PRF was completed were invited to fill in a self-assessment form.

Results: Overall, 189 rheumatologists were surveyed. Among 846 patients with GCA (EU-5: France, N&#3f133; Germany, N&#3f120; Italy, N&#3f144; Spain, N&#3f120; UK, N&#3f129; US: N&#3f200), 63% were female, 94% were white, mean age was 71 years and median time since diagnosis was 15.2 months. Most patients were using GCs, regardless of time since diagnosis. The next most common treatments were tocilizumab (EU-5, 24%; US, 48%) and methotrexate (EU-5, 39%; US, 26%; Figure 1). Median time from diagnosis to receiving tocilizumab or methotrexate was approximately 5 months. Over the last 12 months, median cumulative GC doses were 4343 mg, 5200 mg and 2196 mg for patients diagnosed < 1 year, 1–2 years, and >2 years ago, respectively. Most rheumatologists (87%) aimed to taper to low dose GCs by 12 months and 79% aimed to taper off GCs completely by 24 months post-diagnosis. At 24–< 36 months post-diagnosis, 80% of patients were on an average daily GC dose of 8.4 mg, and 75% were taking an average of 5.3 mg/day at ≥48 months (Figure 2). The number of patients experiencing ≥1 GC-related AE was higher when reported by rheumatologists (74%) compared to patients (55%; Figure 3). Most rheumatologists (EU-5, 90%; US, 94%) agreed that ATs should be given early in GCA treatment to improve outcomes and reduce GC toxicity. Over 90% of rheumatologists believed the following AT attributes were important: maintenance of remission; achievement of GC-free remission; reduction of high-dose/cumulative GC use; to allow GC cessation; and to be safe, tolerable, and patient-compliant. Most rheumatologists agreed that limited choices in AT administration routes are a barrier to widespread use (EU-5, 51%; US, 80%) and that convenient administration is an important attribute of ATs (EU-5, 65%; US, 84%). Most patients (75%) stated that they preferred receiving treatments orally rather than by injection or infusion.

Conclusion: Even though most rheumatologists aimed to taper patients off GCs completely by 24 months, 75% of patients were using GCs at 4 years. Both rheumatologists and patients reported several AEs associated with GC use, and rheumatologists recognize the need for early and effective steroid sparing intervention with ATs.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: A. Dua: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 12, Clinical Trials, AstraZeneca, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 12, Clinical Trials, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 4, 5, 12, Clinical Trials, Sanofi, 2, Vasculitis Foundation, 4; A. Kadakia: AbbVie, 3, 11; P. Zueger: AbbVie, 3, 11; S. Marwaha: Adelphi Real World, 3; N. Zerad: AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Setty: AbbVie, 3, 11; W. Jones: Adelphi Real World, 3; V. Devauchelle: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dua A, Kadakia A, Zueger P, Marwaha S, Zerad N, Setty A, Jones W, Devauchelle V. Real World Steroid Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Rheumatologists’ Perceptions on Advanced Therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-steroid-burden-treatment-patterns-and-rheumatologists-perceptions-on-advanced-therapy-in-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-steroid-burden-treatment-patterns-and-rheumatologists-perceptions-on-advanced-therapy-in-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology