ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1543

Real-World Effectiveness of TNF Inhibition in Spondyloarthritis. Data from a Large Nationwide Prospective Cohort – the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Gareth T. Jones1, Andrew Keat2, Ejaz Pathan3 and Gary J. Macfarlane1, 1Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology., Northwick Park Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3Department of Rheumatology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Biologic agents, outcomes, registry and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

TNF inhibition has revolutionised the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). Much of what we know about the use of these drugs comes from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, RCT populations are highly selected, often from specialist centres, and there are potential threats to external validity – i.e. that the treatment effect in this sub-group of patients is not representative of the wider eligible patient population.

The aim of the current study, using a large, nationally representative patient registry, was to (a) determine the effectiveness of TNF inhibition in a large ‘real-world’ patient population; and (b) examine predictors of treatment failure.

Methods:

The British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis recruits patients with AxSpA newly starting TNF inhibition. At baseline, clinical and patient-reported data is collected from the medical notes and patient questionnaires. Patients are followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months, and treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve an ASAS20 response by 1yr – a composite outcome comprising patient global assessment, pain, function, and inflammation.

Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between baseline clinical and patient-reported characteristics and treatment failure.

Results:

Data were available on 354 patients recruited between Apr-2013 and Sep-2016, of whom 127 (36%) had failed to achieve an ASAS20 response by 1yr. There was no difference in age between those who did / did not achieve an ASAS20 response, nor by gender.

Patients with peripheral joint disease were significantly less likely to achieve ASAS20 response than other patients (OR: 1.90; 95%CI: 1.13-3.19). There was some evidence that patients with non-radiographic disease and those who were HLA-B27 negative were less likely to respond than other patients, although this did not reach statistical significance (see Table). Similarly, no clear or significant association was observed with disease activity or function.

Conclusion:

We have shown, in this real-world AxSpA patient population receiving their first TNF inhibitor, around two-thirds achieve satisfactory treatment response within 1yr. This is reassuringly comparable to the proportion of responders in randomised clinical trial populations. There are few strong predictors of treatment response and it may be that some patients have other conditions (e.g. fibromyalgia) that may be less likely to respond to biologic therapy. Early identification of patients who fail to respond within 1yr remains a clinical challenge, emphasising the importance of early monitoring after commencing these therapies.

Table: Factors associated with failure to achieve ASAS20 response by 1yr
Baseline exposure

OR (95%CI) for failure to

achieve ASAS20 response by 1yr

Age (quartiles) 18-34yrs 1.00
34-44yrs 0.86 (0.43-1.69)
44-54yrs 1.11 (0.58-2.13)
54-82yrs 1.27 (0.68-2.36)
Sex Male 1.00
Female 1.19 (0.74-1.90)
Extra-spinal features (Yes versus No) Peripheral joint involvement 1.90 (1.13-3.19)
Uveitis 0.72 (0.42-1.22)
Psoriasis 1.11 (0.56-2.20)
Inflammatory bowel disease 1.29 (0.69-2.41)
Modified New York criteria Positive 1.00
Negative 1.22 (0.78-1.91)
HLA-B27 Positive 1.00
Negative 1.67 (0.95-2.94)
Disease activity (BASDAI) <4.0 1.93 (0.81-4.56)
4.0-4.9 1.00
5.0-5.9 1.01 (0.44-2.32)
6.0-6.9 0.66 (0.29-1.52)
7.0-7.9 0.98 (0.45-2.10)
8.0-8.9 0.66 (0.28-1.58)
>=9.0 1.46 (0.52-4.13)
Function (BASFI) <4.0 1.94 (0.79-4.79)
4.0-4.9 1.00
5.0-5.9 1.34 (0.50-3.58)
6.0-6.9 0.66 (0.24-1.85)
7.0-7.9 1.68 (0.66-4.32)
8.0-8.9 2.08 (0.82-5.27)
>=9.0 2.43 (0.93-6.35)


Disclosure: G. T. Jones, AbbVie, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,UCB, 2; A. Keat, None; E. Pathan, None; G. J. Macfarlane, Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jones GT, Keat A, Pathan E, Macfarlane GJ. Real-World Effectiveness of TNF Inhibition in Spondyloarthritis. Data from a Large Nationwide Prospective Cohort – the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-effectiveness-of-tnf-inhibition-in-spondyloarthritis-data-from-a-large-nationwide-prospective-cohort-the-british-society-for-rheumatology-biologics-register-for-ankylosing-spondylit/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-effectiveness-of-tnf-inhibition-in-spondyloarthritis-data-from-a-large-nationwide-prospective-cohort-the-british-society-for-rheumatology-biologics-register-for-ankylosing-spondylit/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology