ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2247

REAL-Life Cost of UK Healthcare Resource for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Comparing High and Low/Remission Disease States

Bruce Kirkham1, Estee Chan2, Alexandra Vincent2 and Alison Elliott3, 1Rheumatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Market Access Directorate, Roche Products LTD UK, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: cost containment and remission, Quality Indicators

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) has differing therapeutic outcomes, with resulting differences in function and quality of life. Little is known about the effects of disease activity states on costs of routine care of people with RA. We quantified the real medical costs of treating patients with RA who were in a high DAS28 state (HDAS) versus low DAS28 or remission (LDAS), in a Guys & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) and Roche Products Ltd collaborative project.

Methods: The GSTT RA Centre database of 1,700 patients with RA, was used to generate two groups of 60 patients with high DAS28 (DAS28>5.1) scores and low DAS/remission, matched in terms of age, sex and duration of disease. Patients with co-morbidities such as significant chronic medical conditions, cancer and fibromyalgia were excluded to ensure comparable groups. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and EQ-5D values were compared. All medical costs incurred at GSTT from August 2013 to September 2015 were collated, including drug costs, inpatient and outpatient procedures and investigations.

Results: The mean and range for average HAQ-DI and EQ-5D respectively was 1.78 (0.15-2.92) and 0.286 (0.691 – [-0.239]) for the HDAS group and 0.70 (0-2.31) and 0.714 (1-0.258) for the LDAS group, both significantly different. Total GSTT pharmaceutical costs were £390,904, with biologic drug costs of £377,507 for HDAS patients and £324,805, with biologic drug costs of £321,401, for LDAS patients. 17 people in the HDAS group took concomitant prednisolone compared to 5 in the LDAS group. Total costs for the HDAS group were £733.984.02 ($1,078,957) vs £483,755.97 ($711,121) for the LDAS group, a difference of £250,228.05 ($367,835). Costs for patients living near our centre to those living at a distance did not differ significantly indicating that much of their hospital care took place at GSTT. The annual GSTT cost per patient increment of HDAS RA vs LDAS RA was £2085 ($3,066). These costs do not capture non-GSTT healthcare costs.

Conclusion: This study describes ‘real world’ hospital costs of treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have different disease activity, with minimal co-morbidity differences, treated by the same team. Poor function and quality of life for those people in high disease activity despite higher use of concomitant steroids and similar biologic drug use, shows the challenging nature of their RA. The data further support strategies to treat early and effectively by demonstrating that patients with low disease activity has a lower cost impact on the Trust and improved function and quality of life scores.


Disclosure: B. Kirkham, None; E. Chan, None; A. Vincent, None; A. Elliott, Roche Products LTD, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kirkham B, Chan E, Vincent A, Elliott A. REAL-Life Cost of UK Healthcare Resource for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Comparing High and Low/Remission Disease States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-life-cost-of-uk-healthcare-resource-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-comparing-high-and-lowremission-disease-states/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-life-cost-of-uk-healthcare-resource-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-comparing-high-and-lowremission-disease-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology