ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 838

Rates of New-Onset Pulmonary Disease Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Sweden

Lindsy J. Forbess1, Michael Weisman2 and Julia F Simard3, 1Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Division of Rheumatology, Los Angeles, CA, 3Division of Epidemiology, Health Research and Policy Department, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods, interstitial lung disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Lung Disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health I: Lung, Bone, and Infection Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Our goal was to examine lung disease and types of pulmonary manifestations observed in patients with SLE. We studied population-based register data from Sweden to determine the incidence of pulmonary diagnoses among incident and prevalent SLE patients compared to the general population.

Methods: Using data from a linkage of Swedish registers we identified patients with SLE (at least 2 SLE coded discharge diagnoses and at least 1 SLE-specific discharge diagnosis by a specialist who manages SLE) and matched them to individuals from the general population on age, sex, and county of residence when the SLE index case first presented with SLE. Pulmonary diagnoses were identified using ICD codes from the National Patient Register’s (NPR) discharge diagnoses for inpatient and outpatient visit data. Those with a history of pulmonary disease were excluded. Individuals were followed until they had their first pulmonary diagnosis, died, emigrated, or reached the study end. We calculated incidence rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) overall and by type of pulmonary disease, for incident (2003-2013) and prevalent SLE (2001-2013). To be classified as incident SLE, an individual’s first SLE diagnosis code had to occur in 2003 or later. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for the association between SLE and pulmonary disease in age and sex adjusted models. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of results using semi-automated approach to quantitative probabilistic bias analysis to account for potential bias due to unmeasured confounding by smoking.

Results: 3,209 incident SLE cases were identified using NPR data in Sweden contributing a median 4.8 person-years of follow-up time (vs. 5.1 among non-SLE comparators). We also identified a contemporary cohort of 6,908 individuals with prevalent SLE. The incidence rate for new onset pulmonary disease (about 14 cases per 1000 person-years) was similar in prevalent and incident SLE. Those with incident SLE had a nearly six-times higher rate of new onset pulmonary disease compared to the non-SLE comparator (HR=5.80 (4.84,6.95)) and were comparable in male and female patients. Incident and prevalent SLE was associated with an increased rate of interstitial lung disease (ILD), (HR=19.0 (10.7, 34.0) and 14.3 (10.8-18.8), respectively). Bias due to unmeasured confounding by smoking was unlikely to explain our findings in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Lung disease is common among SLE patients, and particularly increased when compared to the general population. Clinicians caring for SLE patients should have a heightened suspicion for lung disease, including ILD, even early within the disease course.

Table. Relative risk of pulmonary disease among SLE compared to non-SLE general population comparators overall and by type of pulmonary disease, presented as age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Prevalent SLE

6908 SLE

37046 non-SLE 

Incident SLE

3209 SLE

17658 non-SLE

Any pulmonary disease

5.42 (4.90-5.99)

5.80 (4.84-6.95)

 

 

By specific pulmonary disease

 

Interstitial lung disease

14.27 (10.84-18.78)

19.04 (10.66-34.00)

ARDS and hemorrhage

5.78 (3.94-8.48)

5.34 (2.72-10.49)

Pleural disorders

4.64 (3.92-5.49)

5.91 (4.43-7.89)

Pulmonary hypertension

6.75 (4.74-9.61)

6.14 (3.19-11.82)

Pulmonary embolism

3.77 (3.12-4.55)

3.78 (2.64-5.40)

Diseases of the upper airway

4.19 (3.04-5.79)

3.10 (1.66-5.79)

Pulmonary edema

4.32 (2.80-6.65)

3.30 (1.40-7.80)

  

 

 


Disclosure: L. J. Forbess, None; M. Weisman, None; J. F. Simard, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Forbess LJ, Weisman M, Simard JF. Rates of New-Onset Pulmonary Disease Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Sweden [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-new-onset-pulmonary-disease-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-sweden/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-new-onset-pulmonary-disease-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-sweden/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology