ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1962

Rates of Malignancy Associated with Anti-TNF Agents and Subsequent Biologic Use after Malignancy Using U.S. SEER Registry Data

Huifeng Yun1, Fenglong Xie2, Shuo Yang2, Lang Chen1 and Jeffrey R. Curtis3, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: cancer and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), DMARDs

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III: Rheumatic Disease Risk and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been widely used for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in United States. However, it is not clear whether biologics are associated with elevated cancer risk. We estimated cancer incidence rates (IRs) among anti-TNF users and evaluated biologic use after cancer diagnosis among RA patients, using validated cancer outcomes from the U.S. SEER program.

Methods: Using 2006-2013 SEER-Medicare linked data and a 5% non-cancer sample, we identified new anti-TNF users (etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab) among RA patients, identified using algorithms that required ≥ 1 rheumatologist diagnosis code for RA at any time before specific drug use. New users were defined specific to each drug as no use of that therapy in the ‘baseline’ period. Eligible subjects were continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B and D in baseline and throughout follow up. Patients with history of cancer were excluded. We identified all cancers reported to SEER nationally, as confirmed nationally by trained tumor registrars. Follow up started from the drug initiation date and ended at the earliest date of: malignancy, a 90-day gap in current exposure, death, switch to another biologic, or loss of Medicare coverage. We calculated the number of cancer events in both SEER and 5% non-cancer sample, and then calculated the weighted national IRs of cancer for each drug, along with 95% confidence interval, by multiplying the observed person years for non-cancer patients with 20. Subgroup analyses based on the concurrent use of methotrexate (MTX) were conducted. We also evaluated patients’ subsequent biologic use after their cancer diagnosis.

Results: We identified 1,374 new anti-TNF users in SEER-Medicare linked cancer registry and 5% non-cancer sample. Of these, 36.5% used infliximab, 25.9% adalimumab, 20.3% etanercept, 11.0% certolizumab, and 6.1% golimumab. During follow-up, we identified 231 cancers yielding a weighted IR from a low of 0.8 (golimumab) to a high of 1.9 (certolizumab) per 1000 person years across different anti-TNFs. IRs with concurrent MTX use were greater than those without MTX (table). After cancer diagnosis, 60-70% of patients resumed the same anti-TNF, 15-25% discontinued all biologic use, and the remainder switched to non-biologic DMARDs or other biologics. This pattern was consistent across different anti-TNFs.  

Conclusion: Crude incidence rates of cancer among RA patients were comparable between users of different anti-TNF users. Concurrent MTX use was associated with higher cancer risk, although ongoing work is evaluating potential confounding.

Table: Incident rates of cancer in 2006-2013 SEER- Medicare data among anti-TNF users with RA, with and without concurrent methotrexate use

Anti-TNFs

MTX

Validated
Cancer Events, n

Weighted Average

Follow-up time†

Weighted cancer incidence rate
(95% CI) per
1000 person years

Adalimumab

No

18

2332

0.77( 0.49- 1.23)

 

Yes

34

2944

1.15( 0.83- 1.62)

Certolizumab

No

9

1353

0.66( 0.35- 1.28)

 

Yes

10

1017

0.98( 0.53- 1.83)

Etanercept

No

19

2658

0.71( 0.46- 1.12)

 

Yes

28

2074

1.35( 0.93- 1.96)

Golimumab

No

5

574

0.87( 0.36- 2.09)

 

Yes

2

410

0.49( 0.12- 1.95)

Infliximab

No

40

4415

0.91( 0.66- 1.24)

 

Yes

66

4962

1.33( 1.05- 1.69)

MTX: Methotrexate

† calculated by multiplying 20 and observed patient years among non-cancer sample, and then adding the observed patient years for cancer patients.

                                                                                                 

 


Disclosure: H. Yun, BMS, 2; F. Xie, None; S. Yang, None; L. Chen, None; J. R. Curtis, UCB Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Amgen, Roche, Myriad Genetics, Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, 2,UCB Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Amgen, Roche, Myriad Genetics, Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yun H, Xie F, Yang S, Chen L, Curtis JR. Rates of Malignancy Associated with Anti-TNF Agents and Subsequent Biologic Use after Malignancy Using U.S. SEER Registry Data [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-malignancy-associated-with-anti-tnf-agents-and-subsequent-biologic-use-after-malignancy-using-u-s-seer-registry-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-malignancy-associated-with-anti-tnf-agents-and-subsequent-biologic-use-after-malignancy-using-u-s-seer-registry-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology