ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2467

RAPID3 Is Elevated in 93% of Treatment-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients at Initial Visit Compared to 49% for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and 44% for C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

Mariam Riad, Jacquelin R. Chua, Isabel Castrejón and Theodore Pincus, Division of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: laboratory tests and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Complications of Therapy, Outcomes, and Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Quantitative measures to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) traditionally have been laboratory tests, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). However, ESR and CRP values have been found to be normal in about 40% of RA patients 1, 2. By contrast, RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data) self-report scores are reported elevated in more than 75% of RA patients, and generally are more effective than laboratory tests to distinguish active from control treatment in clinical trials 3. Normal initial measures can document worsening of clinical status, but not improvement, at future visits. We analyzed the proportion of treatment-naïve RA patients at an initial visit to an academic rheumatology setting for elevated or normal values for RAPID3, ESR and CRP.

Methods:

All patients at one academic setting complete a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), which includes RAPID3 and other scales, at each visit. RAPID3 is an index of the 3 self-report 0-10 measures, physical function, pain, and patient global assessment, compiled into a 0-30 score. A retrospective analysis of RAPID3, ESR, and CRP data at initial visits of RA patients was conducted. RAPID3 scores were classified as remission (≤ 3), low (3.1-6), moderate (6.1-12), and high (≥12) severity 4. ESR and CRP were classified according to normal values at the study site laboratory as ESR < or >17 mm/hr in men, < or >27 mm/hr in women, and CRP < or >8 mg/dl. ESR data for men and women were merged. Cross-tabulations were performed to compare patients in 4 RAPID3 categories, according to whether ESR or CRP or both ESR and CRP were normal or abnormal; chi-square tests were used to analyze statistical significance.

Results:

Overall, 105 patients were studied; 78% female, mean (SD) age 54.2 (15), RAPID3 13.9 (7.2), ESR 33.7 (29.9) and CRP 22 .1 (47.9). Among all 105 patients, elevated ESR was seen in 49%, elevated CRP in 44%, both elevated CRP and ESR in 32%, and elevated RAPID3 in 93%, including 82% with moderate, and 65% high severity (Table). Among 86 patients whose RAPID3 indicated moderate or high disease severity, elevated ESR was seen in 38 (44%), elevated CRP in 41 (48%), and both elevated ESR and CRP in 29 (34%). By contrast, 5 of 7 patients with RAPID3 <3 had elevated ESR, and 1 elevated CRP as well as ESR (Table). One limitation of is that comorbidities, which can lead to elevated rapid RAPID3 scores, were not collected systematically.

Table. Number of patients who had elevated ESR or CRP or both ESR and CRP according to 4 RAPID3 categories of remission, low, moderate, and high severity among 105 RA patients on initial visit to an academic rheumatology setting

RAPID3 Categories

Remission

(≤3)

Low

(3.1-6)

Moderate

(6.1-12)

High

(≥12)

P

High ESR

M>17 mm/hr.

F>27 mm/hr.

51

(49%)

5

(5%)

8

(8%)

6

(6%)

32

(30%)

0.189

High CRP

>8 mg/dl.

46

(44%)

1

(1%)

4

(4%)

6

(6%)

35

(33%)

0.142

High CRP+ESR

34

(32%)

1

(1%)

4

(4%)

4

(4%)

25

(24%)

0.476

Total No. of patients

105

7

(7%)

12

(11%)

18

(17%)

68

(65%)

Conclusion:

At the initial visit of treatment naïve RA patients, RAPID3 was substantially more likely to be elevated than ESR or CRP to monitor disease status and document improvement.

References:

1- J Rheumatol. 2009 Jul;36(7):1387-90

2- J Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;21(7):1227-37

3- Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(2):117-20

4- Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;35(4):773-8


Disclosure: M. Riad, None; J. R. Chua, None; I. Castrejón, None; T. Pincus, Medical History Services, LLC, 7, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Riad M, Chua JR, Castrejón I, Pincus T. RAPID3 Is Elevated in 93% of Treatment-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients at Initial Visit Compared to 49% for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and 44% for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rapid3-is-elevated-in-93-of-treatment-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-patients-at-initial-visit-compared-to-49-for-erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate-esr-and-44-for-c-reactive-protein-crp/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rapid3-is-elevated-in-93-of-treatment-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-patients-at-initial-visit-compared-to-49-for-erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate-esr-and-44-for-c-reactive-protein-crp/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology