ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2523

Rapid Response with Upadacitinib Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Csdmards or Bdmards

Oliver FitzGerald1, Andrea Rubbert-Roth2, Kun Chen3, Sebastian Meerwein4, Jose Jeffrey Enejosa3, Tim Shaw3 and Alvin F. Wells5, 1St. Vincent’s Univ Hospital and Conway Inst Univ College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 2Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4AbbVie Deutschland, Ludwigshafen, Germany, 5Rheum and Immunotherapy Ctr, Franklin, WI

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, Janus kinase (JAK) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor selective for JAK1, demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response (IR) to csDMARDs or bDMARDs in the SELECT-NEXT1 and SELECT-BEYOND2 trials, respectively. The purpose of the analysis was to investigate the speed of response to UPA across disease measures in csDMARD- and bDMARD-IR pts.

 

Methods: 661 pts in NEXT and 498 in BEYOND received UPA 15mg or UPA 30mg once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks (wks)1,2. Time to first achievement of clinically meaningful outcomes, including ACR20/50, DAS28-CRP≤3.2 and Low Disease Activity (LDA) measures of CDAI (≤10) and SDAI (≤11) was evaluated. The cumulative incidences of ACR20/50, DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 and LDA by CDAI and SDAI over 12 wks were estimated. Hazard ratios between UPA and PBO were obtained using Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group, corresponding baseline values and main stratification factors, without control for multiple comparisons. All analyses were based on observed data without imputation.

 

Results: Pts had a disease duration of 7 and 13 years in NEXT and BEYOND respectively.1,2 In BEYOND, pts were treatment-refractory as evidenced by 53% having received ≥2 prior bDMARDs2. Median times to achieve ACR20 were similar, irrespective of pt population, being 4 wks for UPA 15mg QD and 2-3 wks for UPA 30mg QD vs 12 wks on PBO (p<.001). In general, the median times to achieve ACR50 and DAS28-CRP≤3.2 for UPA 15mg and 30mg QD were -12 wks and -8 wks for both csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR pts, whereas the median was not reached for pts on PBO during the first 12 wks (p< 0.001, Table 1). The median time to LDA by CDAI and SDAI was -12 wks across UPA doses and populations, but was not reached for pts receiving PBO within that time. Pts receiving UPA were 2-4 times more likely to achieve clinical responses vs pts receiving PBO. In general, both UPA doses performed similarly across pt populations, with numerically quicker responses observed in pts receiving UPA 30mg vs UPA 15mg QD. Median times to achieve 20% and 50% improvements in tender and swollen joint counts were 1-2 wks and 2-4 wks respectively, for both UPA doses, irrespective of pt population. Median times to achieve 20% improvements in morning stiffness duration and severity were approximately 2 wks in each of the UPA arms vs 4 wks on PBO (p< 0.001).

 

Conclusion: Pts receiving UPA at either 15mg or 30mg QD were more likely to achieve clinical responses at significantly earlier time points when compared with pts receiving PBO. Irrespective of being csDMARD-IR or bDMARD-IR, times to achieve various clinical responses were consistent between pt populations.


References: 1. Burmester et al; Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69 S10

2. Genovese et al; Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69 S1


Disclosure: O. FitzGerald, Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, BMS and Janssen, 2,Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, BMS and Janssen, 8; A. Rubbert-Roth, Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, 5,Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, 8; K. Chen, AbbVie, 1, 3; S. Meerwein, AbbVie, 1, 3; J. J. Enejosa, AbbVie, 1, 3; T. Shaw, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; A. F. Wells, AbbVie, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

FitzGerald O, Rubbert-Roth A, Chen K, Meerwein S, Enejosa JJ, Shaw T, Wells AF. Rapid Response with Upadacitinib Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Csdmards or Bdmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rapid-response-with-upadacitinib-treatment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-csdmards-or-bdmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rapid-response-with-upadacitinib-treatment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-csdmards-or-bdmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology