ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1718

Randomization to Holding versus Continuing (JAKi, IL17) and Autoimmune Patient Responses to COVID-19 Boosters: Results from the Covid-19 VaccinE Response in Rheumatology Patients (COVER) Study

Amy Mudano1, Gary Cutter2, Emily Holladay3, Kevin Winthrop4, Ted Mikuls5, Geoffrey Thiele5, Mark Law5, Monique Bastidas6, Mike Zikry6, Kelly Chun6, Michael George7, Jayashree Sinha8, Naiara Alvarez9, John Tesser10 and Jeffrey Curtis11, and COVER Site Principal Investigator Group, 1Illumination Health, Hoover, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Edmond, OK, 4School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 5University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 6Labcorp, Calabasas, CA, 7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 8self employed, Clovis, NM, 9Integrative Rheumatology of South Texas, McAllen, TX, 10Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, Phoenix, AZ, 11University of Alabama at Birmingham, Hoover, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: COVID-19, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Epidemiology & Public Health II

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Best practice for the use of immunosuppression to optimize vaccine response remains uncertain. We conducted the Covid VaccinE Response (COVER) trial, a multicenter, randomized controlled platform trial to assess the response to the SARS-CoV-2 booster in rheumatology patients on immunomodulatory therapies. The primary goal was to assess whether randomizing to hold Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), abatacept (ABA), or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for 2 weeks at the time of COVID-19 booster yields improved vaccine response compared to continuing therapy. Our previous report (ACR Convergence 2023) found no significant benefit from holding ABA or TNFi for 2 weeks but did observe a diminished antibody response to COVID boosting in ABA patients.

Methods: COVER enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) being treated with JAKi/biologics in the Excellence Network in RheumatoloGY (ENRGY), a practice-based research network of US rheumatologists. Patients, who previously received >2-dose mRNA vaccines, were randomized (1:1) to continue or hold therapy for 2 weeks following a COVID-19 booster. LabCorp Cov2Quant IgG™ anti-Spike assay measured anti-Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) IgG antibodies before and 6 + 2 weeks after the booster dose. We compared mean log-transformed differences pre- and post-booster and report the geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) by intervention group and therapy. We used linear regression, including all study arms (ABA and TNFi), to compare groups for change in COVID-19 RBD antibody levels, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, methotrexate use, steroid use, and time from booster to measurement. Patient-reported flare following booster was compared by intervention group.

Results: Patients on JAKi (n=232) or IL-17i (n=121) were 79% female, 88% white, 29% Hispanic, with mean (SD) age of 59.2 (11.6) years and BMI of 31.8 (7.6) kg/m2 (Table 1). Report of flare following booster was greater among those holding therapy for 2 weeks (JAKI: 34% in hold group vs 9% continue, p< 0.0001; IL-17i: 30% vs 16%, p=0.20). Following vaccine booster dose, RBD antibody titers increased significantly in both JAKi and IL-17i groups (p< 0.0001 for all arms) (Figure 1) and all groups showed a GMFR >3 (Table 2). Mean increase in RBD antibodies in the hold vs. continue arm was not significantly different by drug group, before or after adjustment. A decreased effect in change in RBD antibodies was seen for JAKi (β=-0.42, p=0.018) and ABA (β=-0.73, p< 0.001), referent to IL-17i, as well as steroid use (β=-0.31, p=0.041); higher BMI (β=0.015, p=0.039) was associated with greater change in antibody levels.

Conclusion: RA and SpA patients taking JAKi or IL-17i had a significant increase in humoral antibody response after receiving a COVID-19 booster and holding therapy for 2 weeks did not enhance response compared to continuing therapy. As previously observed with ABA, use of JAKi blunted COVID-19 vaccine responses. Based on these interim results and an increase in the frequency of disease flare, interrupting JAKi or IL-17i at the time of COVID-19 boosting does not appear warranted. Work is ongoing to evaluate response based on neutralizing antibodies.  

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: A. Mudano: None; G. Cutter: , Cynata Therapeutics, 1, , Immunic, 1, AI therapeutics, 1, Alexion, 1, AMO Pharma, 1, Antisense Therapeutics, 1, Applied Therapeutics, 1, Argenx, 1, Astra-Zeneca, 1, Avexis Pharmaceuticals, 1, Avotres, 1, Biogen, 1, Bristol Meyers Squibb, 1, Clene Nanomedicine, 1, Clinical Trial Solutions LLC, 1, Cognito Therapeutics, 1, CSL Behring, 1, DiameticaTherapeutics, 1, Endra Life Sciences, 1, Genentech,, 1, Genzyme, 1, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 1, Hoya Corporation, 1, Immunic, 1, Immunosis Pty Ltd, 1, Inhibrix, 1, Karuna Therapeutics, 1, Kezar Life Sciences, 1, Klein-Buendel Incorporated, 1, Linical, 1, Mapi Pharmaceuticals LTD, 1, Medtronic, 1, Merck, 1, Merck/Serono, 1, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Holdings, 1, Novartis, 1, Perception Neurosciences, 1, Pipeline Therapeutics, 1, Protalix Biotherapeutics, 1, Prothena Biosciences, 1, Pythagoras, Inc., 4, 8, 12, SUb S corporation for consulting, Reata Pharmaceuticals, 1, Regeneron, 1, Roche, 1, SAB Biotherapeutics, 1, Sanofi-Aventis, 1, Sapience Therapeutics, 1, Scott&Scott LLP, 1, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 1, United BioSource LLC, 1, University of Texas Southwestern, 1, Visioneering Technologies, Inc., 1; E. Holladay: None; K. Winthrop: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, Roche, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; T. Mikuls: Elsevier, 9, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate), 9; G. Thiele: None; M. Law: None; M. Bastidas: None; M. Zikry: None; K. Chun: None; M. George: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Janssen, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5; J. Sinha: None; N. Alvarez: None; J. Tesser: Abbvie, 2, 5, 6, Alpine, 5, Amgen, 2, 6, AnaptysBio, 5, Aqtual, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Aurinia, 6, Bendcare, 6, Biogen, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, 6, Celgene, 5, Corevitas, 5, CSL Behring, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Genentech, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, 6, Horizon, 5, IGMBiosciences, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, KolonTissueGene, 5, Novartis, 2, Organogenesis, 5, Pfizer, 5, 6, Sanofi/Genzyme, 2, 5, 6, Setpoint, 5, UCB, 2, 5; J. Curtis: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Aqtual, 5, Bendcare, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Crescendo, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, FASTER, 2, 4, Genentech, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Moderna, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mudano A, Cutter G, Holladay E, Winthrop K, Mikuls T, Thiele G, Law M, Bastidas M, Zikry M, Chun K, George M, Sinha J, Alvarez N, Tesser J, Curtis J. Randomization to Holding versus Continuing (JAKi, IL17) and Autoimmune Patient Responses to COVID-19 Boosters: Results from the Covid-19 VaccinE Response in Rheumatology Patients (COVER) Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/randomization-to-holding-versus-continuing-jaki-il17-and-autoimmune-patient-responses-to-covid-19-boosters-results-from-the-covid-19-vaccine-response-in-rheumatology-patients-cover-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/randomization-to-holding-versus-continuing-jaki-il17-and-autoimmune-patient-responses-to-covid-19-boosters-results-from-the-covid-19-vaccine-response-in-rheumatology-patients-cover-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology