ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2486

Radiographic, Clinical and Functional Comparison of Tofacitinib Monotherapy Versus Methotrexate in Methotrexate-Naïve Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eun Bong Lee1, Roy Fleischmann2, Stephen Hall3, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven4, John Bradley5, David Gruben6, Tamas Koncz7, Sriram Krishnaswami5, Gene Wallenstein6, Samuel H. Zwillich5, Bethanie E. Wilkinson6 and the ORAL Start Investigators8, 1Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, 2Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Cabrini Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia, 4Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 5Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 6Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, 7Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, 8Groton, CT

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, Janus kinase (JAK), methotrexate (MTX), randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety & Efficacy of Janus Activated-Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is a novel, oral Janus kinase inhibitor being investigated as a targeted immunomodulator and disease-modifying therapy for RA. This Phase 3, 24-mo study (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) compared efficacy, including inhibition of structural damage, and safety of tofacitinib vs methotrexate (MTX, 10-20 mg/wk) in MTX-naïve patients (pts) with active RA.

Methods: Pts were randomized 2:2:1 (double-dummy, double-blind) to: tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID); tofacitinib 10 mg BID; or MTX 10 mg/wk with 5 mg/wk increments every 4 wks to 20 mg/wk. Predetermined primary endpoints (Mo 6) compared tofacitinib vs MTX for: 1) mean changes from baseline (BL) in van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS); 2) ACR70 response. Evaluation of safety and tolerability was also a primary objective. Results are from planned 12‑mo interim analyses.

Results: Overall, 952 pts were randomized and treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID (N=371), 10 mg BID (N=395), and MTX (N=186). Demographic and BL RA disease characteristics, including radiographic scores (mTSS: 20.30, 18.85, and 16.51 for 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, and MTX, respectively), were similar across groups. Mean changes from BL in mTSS and ACR70 rates at Mo 6 were statistically superior for both doses of tofacitinib vs MTX (Table). There was a statistically significant difference in ACR70 response for both doses of tofacitinib vs MTX by Mo 1 (first post-BL visit) with increasing efficacy over time. Secondary radiographic endpoints were also significantly different for tofacitinib vs MTX: smaller changes in erosion and joint space narrowing scores and greater proportions of pts with no progression from BL (mTSS change ≤0.5) at Mo 6. Other secondary endpoints, including ACR20 and ACR50 responses, mean change in DAS28-4(ESR), DAS28-4(ESR) <2.6 rates, and mean change in HAQ-DI, were significantly better with tofacitinib vs MTX at all timepoints.

The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar across groups (Table). Most AEs were mild or moderate; the most frequently reported AEs in all groups were infections. Herpes zoster occurred in 2.2%, 2.5%, and 1.1% of  tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, and MTX pts, respectively; 1 pt had bone tuberculosis (10 mg BID) and 1 had cytomegalovirus infection (MTX); 2 tofacitinib pts died later in the same trial. Decreases in mean neutrophil counts and small increases in mean serum creatinine were seen in all groups. Increases were seen in mean LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels with tofacitinib. The incidence of aspartate and alanine aminotransferase elevations ≥3x the upper limit of normal was low.

Conclusion: In this Phase 3 study tofacitinib monotherapy significantly inhibited progression of structural damage and improved RA signs and symptoms and physical functioning vs MTX in MTX-naïve pts. The safety of tofacitinib was similar to that reported in other Phase 3 trials reported previously.


Disclosure:

E. B. Lee,

Pfizer Inc.,

5;

R. Fleischmann,

Pfizer Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc.,

5;

S. Hall,
None;

R. F. van Vollenhoven,

Abbott, BMS, GSK, HGS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

2,

Abbott, BMS, GSK, HGS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

5;

J. Bradley,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

D. Gruben,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

T. Koncz,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

S. Krishnaswami,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

G. Wallenstein,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

S. H. Zwillich,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

B. E. Wilkinson,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3;

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/radiographic-clinical-and-functional-comparison-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-versus-methotrexate-in-methotrexate-naive-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology