ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1279

Racial Variation in Total Knee Replacement in a Diverse Community-Based Clinical Trial

Lindsey MacFarlane1, Nancy Cook2, I-Min Lee2, Jeffrey N. Katz3 and Karen H. Costenbader4, 1Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: osteoarthritis and race/ethnicity, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster II (ACR): Healthcare Access, Patterns of Medication Use and Workforce Considerations

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is common with > 700,000 surgeries performed annually in the United States. Racial variation in TKR utilization has been documented in population-based studies, however, there is a paucity of prospective data on disparities in TKR use in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). We aimed to evaluate racial disparity in incident TKRs in a cohort of patients with physician-diagnosed OA followed in a current clinical trial. 

Methods:

Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL) is an ongoing nationwide, racially diverse, community-based, randomized controlled trial of 25,874 males age ≥50 and females age ≥55. We identified a knee pain subgroup with probable knee OA based on: a) self-reported knee pain symptoms in walking 2-3 blocks; b) pain > 1 day/week for > 1 year; and c) a doctor’s diagnosis of OA. This subgroup completed a modified Western Ontario and McMaster’s Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, and reported prior TKR and laterality (103 people with bilateral TKR at baseline were excluded.) Participants reported new TKR, laterality and date, over the 2 year follow-up. We compared baseline WOMAC scores by race using t-tests. In multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses, we investigated the association of race with TKR risk, adjusting for potential confounders including age, sex, race, geographic location, WOMAC pain, function and stiffness, body mass index, income, education level, and self-reported depression. 

Results:

At baseline, 1508 (5.8%) of trial participants were eligible for the knee pain cohort. Of those, 1241 (94.7% of mailed) returned a baseline knee pain questionnaire and 1019 (82%) returned a follow-up questionnaire, a mean of 27 (±4) months after baseline. Within this group, 133 (13%) reported TKR in follow-up. Among those who underwent TKR, mean age was 68 (±7) years, 65% were female, and 13% were Black. Among those who did not have TKR, mean age was 67 (±7) years, 66% were female and 24% Black. All baseline WOMAC score means were significantly higher among Black than White patients. (Table)In multivariable logistic regression analyses, only race and WOMAC pain score were related to TKR incidence. The odds ratio of TKR among Black compared to White patients was 0.40 (95% CI 0.22, 0.74). After adjustment for baseline WOMAC pain and stiffness scores, the odds of TKR among Black patients was further reduced to 0.32 (0.18, 0.58). 

Conclusion:

Despite having worse self-reported worse knee pain, function and stiffness at baseline, and having demonstrated a high level of engagement by virtue of volunteering for a large randomized trial, Black patients had much reduced odds of undergoing TKR compared to White patients. This community-based, racially diverse cohort is unique as subjects have physician-diagnosed OA, and have been followed prospectively. Our data highlights the need for further efforts to correct this large racial disparity.

Table. Baseline WOMAC Scores in Black vs. White Patients

 

Blacks

Whites

p**

WOMAC  Pain score*, mean (SD )

44.81(20.94)

32.21 (15.79)

p<0.0001

WOMAC  Function score*, mean (SD)

44.39 (21.15)

32.12 (17.54)

p<0.0001

WOMAC  Stiffness score*, mean (SD)

51.46 (22.87)

40.19 (20.69)

p<0.0001

Odd Ratios for TKR in Black vs. White Patients

 

Multivariable Model 1***

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Multivariable Model 2***

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Black vs. White Race

0.40 (0.22, 0.74)

0.32 (0.18, 0.58)

CI; confidence interval

* WOMAC pain, function and stiffness scores on 0 (best)-100 (worst) scale

** paired t-test

***Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race, geographic location, body mass index (kg/m2), income, education level, and self-reported depression

***Model 2: adjusted for baseline WOMAC pain and function scores


Disclosure: L. MacFarlane, None; N. Cook, None; I. M. Lee, None; J. N. Katz, None; K. H. Costenbader, Arthritis Care and Research, 5,International Journal of Clinical Practice, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

MacFarlane L, Cook N, Lee IM, Katz JN, Costenbader KH. Racial Variation in Total Knee Replacement in a Diverse Community-Based Clinical Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-variation-in-total-knee-replacement-in-a-diverse-community-based-clinical-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-variation-in-total-knee-replacement-in-a-diverse-community-based-clinical-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology