ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0490

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Psoriatic Arthritis Patient Responses Regarding Disease Burden, Treatment, and Communication with Care Team

Iris Navarro-Millán1, Gail Kerr2, Jeffrey Carter3, Laura Simone4 and Marykate Nelson5, 1Weill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Washington DC VAMC/Georgetown and Howard Universities, Washington, DC, 3PRIME Education, Boynton Beach, FL, 4PRIME, Omaha, NE, 5PRIME Education, Drexel Hill, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis, race/ethnicity, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0483–0509) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: PsA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in perceptions of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease burden as well as various aspects of care across racial/ethnic groups.

Methods: Survey questions assessing PsA patient insights regarding their disease burden and quality of care were developed. From September to October 2022, surveys were deployed to 455 PsA patients either through a leading advocacy organization email list (n = 420) or an additional national patient survey organization (n = 35). Self-reported race/ethnicity was recorded. If patients selected both “white” and another racial/ethnic group, they were included in both groups in the analysis.P values were calculated using the chi-square or Fisher’s Exact tests for counts less than 5.

Results: The age of patients ranged from 28 to 91 years. Three hundred ninety-one identified as white and 76 identified with a racial/ethnic minority group (29 African American/Black, 20 Asian/Pacific Islander, 14 Hispanic/Latinx, 8 Native American/Alaska Native, 5 “Other”).

Racial/ethnic minority PsA patients were less likely to be diagnosed within 12 months from the onset of symptoms (50% vs 71%; P < 0.001) and more frequently uninsured (8% vs. 1%; P < 0.001) compared to white patients. Racial/ethnic minority patients more often had self-described severe disease vs. white patients (41% vs. 14%; P < 0.001) and extreme impact on quality of life and emotional well-being (25% vs. 6%; P < 0.001).

Regarding treatment, racial/ethnic minority PsA patients were less often prescribed a biologic and more frequently received oral glucocorticoids, methotrexate, or no prescription medications compared to white PsA patients (Figure 1). Also less frequent among racial/ethnic minority patients were high levels of knowledge/familiarity with targeted agents such as injectable biologics or oral small molecule inhibitors (42% vs. 81%; P < 0.001) and high satisfaction with treatment (39% vs. 77%; P < 0.001). Financial barriers to managing PsA were four-fold more common in racial/ethnic minority patients (26% vs. 7%; P < 0.001); the difference in concern for risks of medications was similarly significant (29% vs. 3%; P < 0.001).

Gaps in communication with the PsA care team were also observed. Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to feel that they were very/extremely involved in shared decisions regarding their care (60% vs. 82%; P < 0.001). When asked what they wished they had more time to discuss with their care team, racial/ethnic minority PsA patients requested various aspects of the impact of the disease as well as goals and preferences for treatment (Figure 2). Notably, the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options and comorbidities were a lower priority in racial/ethnic minority patients despite a higher percentage of comorbid disease (Figure 2).

Conclusion: These survey findings confirm racial/ethnic disparities across the spectrum of PsA disease from time to diagnosis to treatment, and underscore the dissatisfaction with overall care. There is a need for more time to be spent on educating individuals with PsA to enable shared decisions and improved understanding of therapeutic options.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: I. Navarro-Millán: None; G. Kerr: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 6, Horizon, 2, Janssen, 2, Pfizer, 1, Sanofi, 2; J. Carter: None; L. Simone: None; M. Nelson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro-Millán I, Kerr G, Carter J, Simone L, Nelson M. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Psoriatic Arthritis Patient Responses Regarding Disease Burden, Treatment, and Communication with Care Team [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-ethnic-differences-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patient-responses-regarding-disease-burden-treatment-and-communication-with-care-team/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-ethnic-differences-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patient-responses-regarding-disease-burden-treatment-and-communication-with-care-team/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology