ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1021

Racial Disparities Between Black and White Patients in Joint Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review

Max Krall1, Samuel Good1, Collin Brantner2, Diyu Pearce-Fisher2, Susan Goodman2, Michael Parks2, Peter Sculco2, Cynthia Kahlenberg2, Ajay Premkumar2, Michelle Demetres3 and John FitzGerald1, 1University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Arthroplasty, Disparities

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1013–1032) Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster II: Socioeconomic Determinants

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite the documented efficacy of joint replacement surgery (JRS) for the management of refractory hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), multiple studies have documented lower rates of JRS among Black patients with refractory hip or knee OA. The purpose of this research is to investigate how differences in patient characteristics, cultural characteristics, outcomes after joint replacement surgery (JRS), and structural barriers between Black and White patients may affect the decision to undergo JRS and how those decisions contribute to differences in utilization in JRS.

Methods: Original searches ran on  April 8, 2019, April 7, 2020 and updated October 11, 2022 in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE (ALL – 1946 to Present); Ovid EMBASE (1974 to present); and The Cochrane Library (Wiley). Our population of interest was black patients with hip and/or knee OA, our comparator was white patients with hip and/or knee OA, and our primary outcome was disparities in decisions regarding JRS. We registered the protocol under the PROSPERO international register and followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included any articles which fit within our model (Figure 1).

Results: Searches across the chosen databases retrieved 21,390 results, 14,252 after results after de-duplication, 351 pulled for full text, and 96 selected for inclusion in this review. We then categorized these articles using our conceptual model (Figure 1): 17 in patient characteristics, 17 in cultural characteristics, 55 in joint replacement outcomes and 35 in structural barriers. We further subclassified articles within each category, as outlined in Figure 2.

Relative to white patients, Black patients had higher levels of pain catastrophizing, disability, lower levels of physical function, longer length of stay post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), increased ED visits post THA and TKA, decreased proportions of JRS performed as outpatients, higher rates of discharge to post-acute care facilities, and higher risk of revision after TKA. In certain analyses, the effect of race was shown to be mediated by socioeconomic disadvantage and comorbidity burden.

Conclusion: Preliminary review of the data finds that Black patients undergo JRS at lower rates than White patients. While some of this difference can be explained by lower preference for JRS vs. other arthritis treatments among Black patients, there are significant structural, financial, provider and patient factors that contribute to this difference. Some of these factors could be targeted for intervention to improve access to JRS for Black patients. The articles included for review primarily investigated differences in joint replacement outcomes and structural barriers, with less research studying baseline patient and cultural characteristics.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: model for evaluating disparities in joint replacement surgery.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: number of articles by category in joint replacement decision making model.


Disclosures: M. Krall: None; S. Good: None; C. Brantner: None; D. Pearce-Fisher: None; S. Goodman: NIH, 5, Novartis, 5; M. Parks: None; P. Sculco: DePuy Synthes, 2, EOS Imaging, 2, Intellijoint Surgical, 2, 5, Lima Corporate, 2, Zimmer Biomet, 2, 5; C. Kahlenberg: None; A. Premkumar: None; M. Demetres: None; J. FitzGerald: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Krall M, Good S, Brantner C, Pearce-Fisher D, Goodman S, Parks M, Sculco P, Kahlenberg C, Premkumar A, Demetres M, FitzGerald J. Racial Disparities Between Black and White Patients in Joint Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-disparities-between-black-and-white-patients-in-joint-replacement-surgery-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-disparities-between-black-and-white-patients-in-joint-replacement-surgery-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology