ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2351

Racial Differences in Magnetic Resonance Image-Based Three-Dimensional Bone Shape of the Knee: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

Jing-Sheng Li1, Michael A Bowes2, David T. Felson3, Philip G. Conaghan4, Carrie Brown5 and Tuhina Neogi6, 1Boston University, Boston, MA, 2Imorphics Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 6Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: African-Americans, Biomarkers and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  African Americans have higher prevalence and greater severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) on radiographs compared with Caucasians. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantification of 3-dimensional (3D) anatomical changes of the knees may offer superior insights into potential racial differences in joint morphology compared with radiographs. Therefore, we applied this method to examine anatomical differences between African Americans and Caucasians.

Methods:  We used data from the OAI, a longitudinal cohort study designed to investigate the natural history of and risk factors for knee OA. Active appearance modelling, which has excellent reliability, was used to automatically segment the knee MRI (MAGNETOM Trio, Siemens) sagittal 3D DESS-we sequence from each femur as principal components from a shape model. The OA bone shape vector is a line through the mean shape of a training set of OA and non-OA femurs, also expressed as principal components. Individual bone shapes are projected orthogonally onto the OA bone shape vector. Zero is defined as the mean non-OA shape, 1 unit is 1 SD of the non-OA shape distribution. Positive values indicate more of an OA shape. Separate vectors were prepared for males and females. We quantified the difference in 3D femur bone shape between African Americans and Caucasians, stratified by sex, using linear regression, adjusting for KL grade, age, and body mass index (BMI), using generalized estimating equations to account for the correlation between knees within the same subject.

Results:  We included 1534 African American and 7319 Caucasian knees that had 3D bone shape measured at baseline. Of African Americans, 481 male and 1053 female knees were assessed. Of Caucasians, 3165 male and 1053 female knees were included. In male and female knees, the crude mean 3D bone shape vectors for the distal femur were higher for African Americans compared with Caucasians, even at KL grade 0 (Table 1). Significant differences in 3D bone shape were found between in African Americans and Caucasians, stratified by sex, controlling for age and BMI (Table 2).

Conclusion:  African Americans had more overall anatomical changes of OA than Caucasians in MRI-based 3D femur bone shape, which were not due to differences in KL grade, age, or BMI. Further, African Americans had higher OA vector values, even at KL grade 0, than Caucasians, and this may explain the higher prevalence of OA in African Americans. Of note, age and BMI had only minimal effect on 3D femur bone shape change. This finding of racial differences in 3D bone shape warrants further investigation to understand the underlying mechanisms causing these differences to gain further insight into factors influencing the pathogenesis of OA.

Table 1. Baseline demographics and crude mean 3D OA bone shape vectors.

Male (N=3646)

Female (N=5027)

African American

 Mean (SD)

(n = 481)

CaucasiansMean (SD)

(n=3165)

African American

 Mean (SD)

(n=1053)

Caucasians Mean (SD)

(n=3974)

Overall 3D OA bone shape vectors

1.1 (1.5)

0.6 (1.4)

1.9 (1.8)

0.8 (1.5)

Bone shape at KL 0

0.3 (1.5)

0.0 (1.0)

0.6 (1.3)

0.0 (1.0)

Age, years

58.9 (9.2)

61.2 (9.5)

59.0 (8.2)

62.0 (9.1)

BMI, kg/m2

30.2 (5.1)

28.6 (4.0)

31.5(5.0)

27.6 (5.1)

Table 2. Sex-specific adjusted mean differences in 3D femur bone shape between African American and Caucasian knees, adjusted for age, BML, and KL grade.

Male

Female

β (95% CI)

P value

β (95% CI)

P value

Adjusted mean differences in 3D OA bone shape vectors: African American vs. Caucasian

0.42 (0.27-0.57)

<.0001

0.81 (0.67-0.95)

<.0001

Age (per year increase)

0.0071 (0.0018-0.0124)

0.0083

0.0114 (0.0057-0.0170)

<.0001

BMI (per kg/m2 increase)

0.0271 (0.0151-0.0390)

<.0001

0.0413 (0.0311-0.0515)

<.0001


Disclosure: J. S. Li, None; M. A. Bowes, Imorphics Ltd, 3; D. T. Felson, zimmer knee creations, 5; P. G. Conaghan, AbbVie, Flexion, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, 5,AbbVie, Novartis, Roche, 8; C. Brown, None; T. Neogi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li JS, Bowes MA, Felson DT, Conaghan PG, Brown C, Neogi T. Racial Differences in Magnetic Resonance Image-Based Three-Dimensional Bone Shape of the Knee: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-magnetic-resonance-image-based-three-dimensional-bone-shape-of-the-knee-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-magnetic-resonance-image-based-three-dimensional-bone-shape-of-the-knee-data-from-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-oai/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology