ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1853

Racial Differences in Highly Effective Contraceptive Use Among Medicaid Beneficiaries with SLE

Jessica Williams1, Chang Xu 1, Karen Costenbader 1, Bonnie Bermas 2, Lydia Pace 3 and Candace Feldman 3, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2UT Southwestern, Dallas, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: health disparities and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), race/ethnicity, Reproductive Health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M110: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology (1848–1853)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Highly effective contraception (HEC), which includes intrauterine devices, implants and sterilization, is safe for women with SLE and has a < 1% failure rate for preventing pregnancy. Prior studies have revealed low rates of contraceptive use among reproductive age women with SLE despite periods of high disease activity and frequent teratogenic medication use. Black and Hispanic women with SLE have higher rates of adverse outcomes, including pregnancy complications, compared to white women with SLE. Using U.S. nationwide data, we aimed to examine whether there are racial/ethnic differences in contraception use, and specifically HEC, among women with SLE.

Methods: Using Medicaid claims data from 2000-2010, we identified reproductive age women (18-50 years) with prevalent SLE (3 ICD-9 codes 710.0 separated by ≥30 days). We required 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to the 3rd SLE code (baseline) and 24 months of continuous enrollment after (follow-up). We excluded women ineligible for new contraceptive use (baseline codes for HEC, hysterectomy, or menopause). We examined uptake of contraception by race during follow-up. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, calendar year, region, and the SLE risk adjustment index (proxy for SLE severity), to estimate the odds (OR, 95% CI) by race/ethnicity of: A) any encounter for contraceptive management (vs. none), B) any contraception (vs. none), C) HEC (vs. no HEC), and D) HEC (vs. no HEC) in a subset with ≥1 teratogenic medication prescription during the baseline period. We also conducted sensitivity analyses excluding women with pregnancy codes.

Results: We identified 28,662 female Medicaid beneficiaries with SLE. The mean (SD) age was 36; 44% were black, 34% white, 15% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 1% American Indian/Alaska Native. 15% had an encounter for contraceptive management, 16% received any form of contraception, and 5% received HEC (Figure). Among 4,387 women using a teratogenic medication, 4% received HEC. In multivariable models, compared to white women, despite 1.23 (95% CI 1.13-1.34) times higher odds of a contraceptive visit, black women had 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.82) times lower odds of HEC use. Asian women had significantly lower odds of both contraceptive visits and HEC use (Table). Younger age and living in the Midwest and South were associated with higher odds of HEC receipt; more severe SLE was associated with lower odds. Trends demonstrated significantly increased HEC uptake over time for white women, but not for other racial/ethnic groups. Findings were similar when women with pregnancy codes were excluded.

Conclusion: In this nationwide study of reproductive age women with SLE, HEC uptake was very low, even among women receiving teratogenic medications. Despite more encounters for contraception, black women had lower odds of HEC uptake; Asian women had fewer encounters and lower odds of HEC. With known disparities in pregnancy outcomes by race/ethnicity, further study is needed to understand whether racial/ethnic differences in HEC use among women with SLE are due to provider bias, patient preference, cultural factors, or variable access to reproductive counseling and care.


Figure


Table


Disclosure: J. Williams, None; C. Xu, None; K. Costenbader, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Glaxo Smith Kline, 2, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 2, Lupus Foundation of America, 2, Lupus Research Alliance, 2, Merck, 2; B. Bermas, None; L. Pace, None; C. Feldman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Williams J, Xu C, Costenbader K, Bermas B, Pace L, Feldman C. Racial Differences in Highly Effective Contraceptive Use Among Medicaid Beneficiaries with SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-highly-effective-contraceptive-use-among-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-highly-effective-contraceptive-use-among-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology