ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2238

RA Medication Preferences Among U.S. Patients in an Online Rheumatoid Arthritis Community

Baojin Zhu1, Lawrence Chang1, Leilei Qian1, Cynthia J Larmore1, Yoko Tanaka2 and Andre B. Araujo1, 1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, KS

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: DMARDs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Medications used to manage RA vary in efficacy, safety, and convenience of use. A better understanding of patient preferences of these attributes is key to understanding patient barriers to effective therapeutic management. The objective of this study was to evaluate US patient views of RA medication attributes.  

Methods: The data for this analysis were obtained from the 2015 online RA community survey “Rheumatoid Arthritis in America”. The survey was administered by Health Union between August 6, 2015 and Sep. 12, 2015. Subjects self-identified as having RA and were recruited from RheumatoidArthritis.net subscribers, email and social media (N=3149). Patients aged 18 years or older at RA diagnosis, living in the US, and naïve to clinical trials (N=2735) were included in this analysis. Within the survey, patients ranked eight attributes—reduce the severity of flares, injection, infusion, proven safety record, reduce the number of flares, minimal side effects, pill, and rapid reduction of RA symptoms—assuming equal insurance and cost-effectiveness from 1 (most important) to 8 (least important).  This ranking and patient preference for drug administration route were analyzed for all subjects and by age (<45, 45–64, ≥65 years old), gender, race (Caucasian, yes/no), RA disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe), and use of bDMARDs using ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables.  

Results: Patients ranked “rapid reduction of RA symptoms” at mean (SD): 3.0 (1.8) over “minimal side effects” 3.4 (1.8); “proven safety record” 3.5 (2.0); “reduces the severity of flares” 3.5 (1.6); number of flares 3.6 (1.6); and taken as a pill 5.5 (1.9), injection 6.5 (1.7), or infusion 7.0 (1.7). For drug formulation, the majority (70%) of RA patients surveyed preferred oral medication to injection with preloaded pen (15%), injection with syringe (9%), or infusion (6%), with difference in preference by disease severity and history of bDMARD use (Figure).  

Conclusion: Rapid reduction of symptoms was rated the most important attribute of RA medications, assuming equal insurance and cost-effectiveness. Oral was the preferred route of administration, with more severe (vs. less severe) and bDMARD-current (vs. bDMARD-prior/never) patients having a greater preference for non-oral. A better understanding of patient medication preference should help identify patient barriers to effective management of RA.   Figure 1. Subgroup analysis of drug formulation preference by current disease severity (n=2100) and history of bDMARD use (n=2735).

   


Disclosure: B. Zhu, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; L. Chang, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; L. Qian, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; C. J. Larmore, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; Y. Tanaka, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; A. B. Araujo, Eli Lilly and Company, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhu B, Chang L, Qian L, Larmore CJ, Tanaka Y, Araujo AB. RA Medication Preferences Among U.S. Patients in an Online Rheumatoid Arthritis Community [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ra-medication-preferences-among-u-s-patients-in-an-online-rheumatoid-arthritis-community/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ra-medication-preferences-among-u-s-patients-in-an-online-rheumatoid-arthritis-community/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology