ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0475

Quantitative Analysis of Gender and Racial Disparities in Randomized Controlled Trials of Fibromyalgia

Rami Diab1, Ali Malik2, Mahmoud Al Rifai3 and Dennis Ang4, 1Wake Forest Baptist Health/Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 2Wake Forest Baptist Health / Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 3Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 4Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Duloxetine, fibromyalgia, Milnacipran, Pregabalin

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Fibromyalgia & Other Clinical Pain Syndromes (0474–0477)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:15AM-11:30AM

Background/Purpose: Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, mood disorders, fatigue, and cognitive and sleep disturbance. Mainstay treatments include tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and antiepileptic drugs. The purpose of this study was to examine whether or not gender and racial disparities exist in the context of research subjects recruited for clinical studies performed on the only three FDA approved medications for fibromyalgia.

Methods: The PubMed database was searched for clinical trials studying duloxetine (DLX), milnacipran (MLN), or pregabalin (PRG) for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Studies with randomized, double blind, placebo controlled design involving any of the above medications as monotherapy and reporting on gender and ethnic demographic parameters published over the last 10 years were included. Ethnic backgrounds were grouped into Caucasian or White, African American, Hispanic, Asian, and Other respectively.

Results: A total of 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Paired t-tests demonstrated a female gender preponderance of research participants for all of the DLX, MLN, and PRG treatment groups analyzed separately (p< 0.05 each) and collectively (p< 0.001). White or Caucasian was the predominant ethnic group across all treatment groups analyzed separately (86.4±6.1% DLX, 89.2±6.2% PRG, and 87.3±8.1% MLN) or collectively (87.6±6.7%). There were no statistically significant differences between group means across all treatment groups as determined by one-way ANOVA for White or Caucasian (F(2,25)=1.57, p=0.23), African American (F(2,25)=2.71, p=0.09), Asian (F(2,25)=0.64, p=0.54), or all ethnic groups combined (F(2,25)=1.6, p=0.22); as was the case for studies conducted within (F(2,22)=1.79, p=0.19) or outside (F(1,3)=0.1, p=0.77) the USA. Nonetheless, a statistically significant difference was observed by one-way ANOVA for the Hispanic ethnic group (F(2,25)=5.19, p< 0.05). Paired t-tests revealed a statistically significant overrepresentation of Caucasian or White research subjects (489.25±432.70) in comparison to African American (17±23.39, t(27)=6.06, p< 0.001), Hispanic (21.29±35.43, t(27)=5.78, p< 0.001), Asian (2.93±10.51, t(27)=5.95, p< 0.001), or all other ethnic groups examined (67.32±60.03, t(27)=5.76, p< 0.001). A similar pattern of Caucasian or White subject overrepresentation in comparison to all other ethnic groups was found on subgroup analysis for all of the DLX (mean(diff)=322.20±265.27, t(9)=3.83, p< 0.005), PRG (mean(diff)=604.56±453.60, t(8)=3.40, p< 0.005), and MLN (mean(diff)=350.11±408.85, t(8)=2.57, p< 0.05) treatment groups respectively.

Conclusion: Evidence of widespread gender and racial disparities amongst subjects recruited for clinical trials of various pharmacologic agents for fibromyalgia exist. Whereas female preponderance for fibromyalgia is believed to reflect a true gender predilection of this disorder more research is needed to determine whether or not racial disparities observed indeed reflect on the nature of the disease.

Figure 1: Statistically significant overrepresentation of Caucasian or White research subjects in comparison to all other ethnic groups as determined by paired t-tests (* denotes p<0.005, † denotes p<0.05).

Figure 2: Statistically significant overrepresentation of Caucasian or White research subjects in comparison to African American, Hispanic, Asian, and all other ethnic groups remaining as determined by paired t-tests (* denotes p<0.001).

Figure 3: Demographic representation of research participants by gender (A) and ethnic background (B); and classification of included studies by medication


Disclosures: R. Diab, None; A. Malik, None; M. Al Rifai, None; D. Ang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Diab R, Malik A, Al Rifai M, Ang D. Quantitative Analysis of Gender and Racial Disparities in Randomized Controlled Trials of Fibromyalgia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-analysis-of-gender-and-racial-disparities-in-randomized-controlled-trials-of-fibromyalgia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-analysis-of-gender-and-racial-disparities-in-randomized-controlled-trials-of-fibromyalgia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology