ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1031

Quantifying the Delays to Rheumatologist Consultation and Treatment Among Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Jessica Widdifield1, Sasha Bernatsky2, J Carter Thorne3, Claire Bombardier4, R. Liisa Jaakkimainen5, Vandana Ahluwalia6, J. Michael Paterson7, Noah Ivers4, Debra Butt8 and Karen Tu8, 1McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Rheum/Clin. Epid., McGill MUHC/RVH, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 4University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Preventive Med and Biostatisti, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Past President, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Brampton, ON, Canada, 7ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Access to care and quality measures

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Optimal care for systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases often hinges upon early referral from primary care physicians (PCP) to rheumatologists. Our aim was to quantify the time from symptom onset (T0) to 1st PCP visit related to the complaint (T1) to PCP referral to rheumatologist (T2) to 1st rheumatologist visit (T3), and to treatment (T4).

Methods: We employed a novel approach to identify 1st-time rheumatology referrals from the primary care Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD), representing comprehensive EMR data from 168 PCPs across Ontario, Canada (32 rural, 39 suburban and 97 urban physicians). Using a standardized data abstraction tool, PCP and rheumatology consultation records were reviewed to identify diagnoses and treatments associated with each referral. Administrative data were used to identify accurate dates of the 1st rheumatologist visit subsequent to the date of referral identified in the EMR. The time in days from the date of each component of the care pathway was determined overall and for each diagnostic category.

Results: Among 2430 patients with 1st-time referrals, we identified 745 patients with systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (31%): RA (16%), other inflammatory arthritis (22%), connective tissue diseases (18%), gout/crystal arthropathies (16%), spondyloarthropathies (10%), psoriatic arthritis (6%), polymyalgia rheumatica (9%), and vasculitis (3%). Overall, 21% and 70% of patients were seen by rheumatologists within 3 months of symptom onset and PCP referral, respectively. Wait-time measures varied by condition (table). Comparing to established Canadian wait-time measures (target being 100%), only 38% of RA patients were seen within 4 weeks from the date of referral, 63% of AS/SpA patients were seen within 3 months; and 34% of PsA patients were seen within 6 weeks. For RA patients, the median time to be seen by rheumatologists from symptom onset and referral was 327 and 66 days, respectively.  Within the 1st year, 93% of RA patients had a documented treatment initiated by a rheumatologist, and of these, 95% were prescribed DMARDs, 26% oral steroid, 15% steroid injection, and 6% biologic. The average time to DMARD was 56 days from date of first rheumatology consultation.

Conclusion: Our representative sample of PCPs revealed longer wait-times than previous reports that sampled patients from urban rheumatology clinics and exceed current Canadian recommendations. Most of the delay occurs prior to referral, where targeted efforts are needed to optimize care for more timely consultations.   

Table.

Proportion of Patients seen by

rheumatologists within

RA

n=120

IA

n=167

Crystal

n=122

PMR

n=66

AS/SpA

n=76

PsA

n=44

Vasculitis n=19

CTDs/Other n=131

1 mo. from

Referral

38%

35%

27%

47%

22%

25%

53%

27%

Symptom onset

#

#

5%

#

#

#

#

#

3 mo. from

Referral

71%

70%

64%

71%

63%

59%

74%

62%

Symptom onset

24%

21%

16%

28%

14%

#

28%

17%

6 mo. from

Referral

79%

80%

83%

82%

83%

86%

74%

76%

Symptom onset

42%

46%

35%

53%

34%

34%

39%

30%

9 mo. from

Referral

84%

83%

88%

86%

86%

96%

79%

77%

Symptom onset

50%

59%

45%

63%

39%

43%

44%

42%

12 mo. from

Referral

87%

86%

89%

88%

86%

98%

79%

82%

Symptom onset

59%

66%

47%

72%

41%

49%

56%

47%

Median (IQR) Time

(in days)

Symptom onset (T0) to

PCP (T1)

173

(16-189)

102

(10-112)

188

(4-192)

63

(14-77)

716

(14-730)

228

(17-245)

128

(3-131)

208

(14-222)

PCP visit (T1) to

Referral (T2)

115

(14-128)

125

(11-136)

353

(20-373)

123

(15-138)

173

(7-181)

513

(15-528)

73

(7-80)

181

(7-188)

Symptom onset (T0) to

Referral (T2)

326

(49-375)

259

(41-300)

1326

(48-1374)

238

(55-293)

1342

(63-1405)

627

(90-7167)

293

(33-325)

855

(44-899)

Referral (T2) to

Rheumatologist (T3)

66

(15-81)

55

(17-71)

69

(24-93)

53

(11-64)

62

(29-91)

88

(30-117)

28

(11-39)

62

(22-83)

Symptom onset (T0) to

Rheumatologist (T3)

327

(83-410)

260

(91-350)

1312

(111-1423)

240

(81-321)

1262

(112-1374)

680

(125-805)

608

(59-667)

940

(113-1053)

Abbreviations: RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; IA: Inflammatory Arthritis – other (e.g., undifferentiated); Crystal: Gout and other crystal arthropathies; PMR: Polymyalgia Rheumatica; AS/SpA: Ankylosing Spondylitis and other spondyloarthropathies; PsA: Psoriatic Arthritis; CTDs: Connective Tissue Diseases and other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (e.g., lupus, scleroderma, SjogrenÕs, RaynaudÕs); IQR: interquartile range; # not reported due low count


Disclosure: J. Widdifield, None; S. Bernatsky, None; J. C. Thorne, None; C. Bombardier, None; R. L. Jaakkimainen, None; V. Ahluwalia, None; J. M. Paterson, None; N. Ivers, None; D. Butt, None; K. Tu, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Thorne JC, Bombardier C, Jaakkimainen RL, Ahluwalia V, Paterson JM, Ivers N, Butt D, Tu K. Quantifying the Delays to Rheumatologist Consultation and Treatment Among Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantifying-the-delays-to-rheumatologist-consultation-and-treatment-among-patients-with-systemic-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantifying-the-delays-to-rheumatologist-consultation-and-treatment-among-patients-with-systemic-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology