ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2405

Quality of Patient- Clinician Communication in a Diverse Cohort of Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jennifer Barton1, Chris Tonner2, Laura Trupin1, Patricia P. Katz3 and Edward H. Yelin4, 1Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 23333 California Street, Box 09, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 4Arthritis Research Group, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Communication, race/ethnicity and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To assess correlates of the quality of patient-clinician communication in a diverse cohort of adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Data were obtained through structured 30-minute telephone interviews conducted in English or Spanish. Subjects were enrollees of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcomes Study (RA OS), a longitudinal cohort of adults with RA. Two questions from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CAHPS) were used to assess RA patients’ experience of communication with their rheumatologist: “How often did this doctor check to make sure you understood everything?” and “How often did this doctor spend enough time with you?” Responses options consisted of 5 choices ranging from “never” to “always.” We report the proportion of subjects who responded “always” which is considered by CAHPS as the “Top-box” score. Logistic regression was used to model the quality of communication as a function of demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity), education, health literacy (single-item literacy screener), English language proficiency, disease characteristics (duration, fatigue, disease activity), depression (score ≥10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9), and insurance.

Results: 395 adults with RA were surveyed with a mean age of 61 years, 89% were female, 46% white, 31% Latino. Nearly one-third (31%) had limited health literacy (LHL) and 17% had limited English language proficiency (LEP). Mean disease duration was 23 ± 12 years, 39% reported moderate fatigue and 18% severe, and 17% had a PHQ-9 score ≥10. In multivariate models controlling for disease activity, fatigue, and depression (see table), RA patients with LHL and LEP were more likely to report that their rheumatologist always checked for understanding. However, patients with LEP were less likely to report that their doctor always spent enough time with them, as were Latinos (compared to all other race/ethnic groups). .

Conclusion: Despite the finding that over 90% of RA patients with limited English language proficiency perceive that rheumatologists always check for understanding, only 38% of these same patients and 40% of Latinos report that doctors spend enough time with them. These results were independent of disease activity and depression. Providing high quality, patient-centered care in RA is important for all patients, especially those with barriers to communication. Awareness and interventions to enhance quality of communication and that address cultural expectations for care are needed for vulnerable populations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table. Proportion of subjects who responded “always” to communication questions about rheumatologists among 395 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, from multivariate models^

 

Check to be sure you understood

 

Spend enough time with you

 

 

Overall percent (95% CI)

 

74 (69, 78)

 

59 (54, 63)

 

Sociodemographics

 

 

 

 

Race/ethnicity

 

 

 

*

Latino

74 (64, 84)

 

40 (29, 50)

 

Asian/Pacific Islander

71 (52, 89)

 

69 (51, 87)

 

African American

75 (61, 89)

 

76 (64, 90)

 

Mixed/Other/Unknown

85 (71, 94)

 

72 (60, 85)

 

White

71 (65, 78)

 

61 (54, 69)

 

Limited English language proficiency

*

 

*

No

70 (65, 76)

 

61 (56, 67)

 

Yes

93 (83, 99)

 

38 (18, 57)

 

Limited health literacy

 

*

 

 

No

70 (65, 76)

 

58 (52, 64)

 

Yes

84 (74, 90)

 

60 (52, 69)

 

^Controlled for age, gender, education, insurance, disease activity, disease duration, fatigue, depression (PHQ-9≥10), and all variables listed in table.

* P<0.05

 



Disclosure:

J. Barton,
None;

C. Tonner,
None;

L. Trupin,
None;

P. P. Katz,
None;

E. H. Yelin,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-of-patient-clinician-communication-in-a-diverse-cohort-of-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology