ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1715

Providing High Quality Family Care Planning for Women with Rheumatic Disease in Rheumatology Clinics: Perspectives of Rheumatology Clinicians

Daiva Mitchell1, Leslie Lesoon1, Cuoghi Edens2, Traci Kazmerski3, Olivia Stransky4, Megan Clowse5, Sonya Borrero4 and Mehret Birru Talabi4, 1UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, 2University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 3Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 4University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: family planning, focus group, Reproductive Health, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster (1711–1731)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: While rheumatologists in several descriptive studies have acknowledged the importance of family planning in their care of women with rheumatic diseases, they have also identified key barriers to this care, including time constraints, competing priorities, and inadequate communication with women’s health providers. We conducted a series of focus groups composed of rheumatologists and rheumatology advanced practice providers (APPs) to synthesize their ideas for potential tools and solutions to overcome these barriers within the rheumatology clinical setting.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative focus groups were conducted with rheumatologists (N=3 groups) and APPs (N=2 groups). Trained independent qualitative analysts conducted the focus groups via Zoom video conferencing. Discussions were transcribed and two trained research coordinators developed a content-based codebook. They applied the codebook to transcripts, and discrepancies adjudicated to full agreement with the principal investigator. Differences in codes between the groups by provider type were also identified. The codes were synthesized and used to conduct a thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 22 clinicians participated in the study, most of whom were women (75%) working within academic practice settings (60%). Clinicians had practiced rheumatology for an average of six years (range 1-17 years). Four themes emerged from the focus groups: 1) Clinicians desired patient-directed tools and resources to educate and prepare patients to discuss reproductive health issues at the rheumatology visit; 2) Most clinicians were aware of existing reproductive health resources, but desired additional training or resources around contraception and medication safety; 3) Clinicians desired tools to facilitate contact with women’s health providers to ensure early and uncomplicated access to reproductive health care (e.g., electronic consults); 4) Clinicians were less interested in using electronic health record (EHR) pop-up reminders or alerts to support family planning care, but more interested in using prepopulated text within the EHR to include in patient notes or educational information to add to patient visit summaries. Although similar ideas were generated between the APP and rheumatologist groups, the rheumatologists were generally more interested in additional training and education, whereas APPs were more interested in EHR prompts and tools.

Conclusion: In this study, rheumatologists and rheumatology APPs from primarily academic practice settings described tools and resources that could help them to provide more consistent and higher-quality family planning care to patients with childbearing potential. Future work should focus on the development of patient-facing tools and resources to prepare patients for family planning conversations with rheumatology clinicians. Additional educational resources are needed to address providers’ knowledge gaps around contraception and medication safety in the context of pregnancy. Finally, individual health systems and practices need to prioritize the development of accessible pathways to reproductive health care for women with rheumatic disease.


Disclosures: D. Mitchell, None; L. Lesoon, None; C. Edens, None; T. Kazmerski, None; O. Stransky, None; M. Clowse, UCB Pharma, 2, Pfizer, 5, GSK, 2, 5; S. Borrero, None; M. Birru Talabi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mitchell D, Lesoon L, Edens C, Kazmerski T, Stransky O, Clowse M, Borrero S, Birru Talabi M. Providing High Quality Family Care Planning for Women with Rheumatic Disease in Rheumatology Clinics: Perspectives of Rheumatology Clinicians [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/providing-high-quality-family-care-planning-for-women-with-rheumatic-disease-in-rheumatology-clinics-perspectives-of-rheumatology-clinicians/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/providing-high-quality-family-care-planning-for-women-with-rheumatic-disease-in-rheumatology-clinics-perspectives-of-rheumatology-clinicians/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology