ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 636

Prospective, Intervention, Multicenter Study of Utility of Biologic Drug Monitoring with Respect to the Efficacy and Cost of Adalimumab Tapering in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases (34-week descriptive data)

Iñigo Gorostiza1, Eduardo Úcar Angulo2, Catalina Gómez Arango2, Clara Eugenia Perez3, Juan Ramon De Dios4, Belen Alvarez4, Ana Ruibal Escribano4,5, Claudia Stoye4, Margarida Vasques4, Joaquin Belzunegui Otano6, Antonio Escobar7, Ziortza Trancho8, Ainhoa Ruiz del Agua9, Lorena Del Rio9, Antonio Martínez9 and Daniel Nagore9, 1Research Department, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain, 2Rheumatology, Rheumatology Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Araba, Vitoria, Spain, 5Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Araba, Vittoria, Spain, 6Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain, 7Unidad de Investigación, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC), Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain, 8Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain, 9R&D, Progenika-Grifols, Derio, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Adalimumab, Biologic drugs, health care cost and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Adalimumab (ADL) dose tapering based on clinical assessment is a usual practice especially in patients who have achieved clinical remission. The primary aim of this study is to analyze how personalized management guided by biological drug monitoring (BDM) in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients impacts the annual direct costs of these patients to the Health System and the quality-adjusted life year with respect to conventional practice in Spain. Secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness of BDM in the reduction of the number of days with high disease activity compared with conventional practice. Follow up will be completed in December 2016; here we present partial descriptive data at 34 weeks.

Methods:  Adult patients with RA, PsA or AS treated with ADL who have remained clinically stable for at least 6 months were recruited in three sites. Patients were grouped in Control and Intervention groups according to the recruiting site. All patients were treated with 40 mg of subcutaneous ADL and treatment frequency was adjusted based on physician criteria. All patients are assessed at 8 timepoints (8 visits) for up to 18 months. Trough ADL and anti-drug antibodies levels are measured with Promonitor-ADL and Promonitor-ANTI-ADL (Progenika, Spain). BDM data are released only to the Intervention group, and blinded to the Control group (managed according to clinical assessment only). Physicians in the Intervention group are not obliged to follow any therapeutic algorithm based on BDM results but can use tests to alter doses based on their judgement. Endpoints include DAS28, BASDAI, BASFI and HAQ-DI scores at every timepoint. Criteria for assessing disease scores are identical in the three sites. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated according to associated costs and QALY.

Results:  A total of 169 patients have been recruited (Disease, N Intervention, N Control groups, %) (RA, 30, 33, 37.3%; PsA, 33, 21, 32%; and AS, 46, 6, 30.8%). Median disease duration was 117, 98.5 and 101.5 months for RA, PsA and AS, respectively. At baseline, 10 (16.7%) and 29 (26.6%) patients had low disease activity and 50 (83.3%) and 80 (73.4%) patients were in remission in the Control and Intervention groups respectively, with median trough ADL levels 5.5 and 5.3 mg/L in the Control and Intervention groups respectively. At week 34 median trough ADL levels were 5.2 and 5.5 mg/L in the Control and Intervention groups respectively. Out of the total number of patients who were in remission at baseline (n=117), 69.6% (32/46) and 76.1% (54/71) remained in remission at week 34 in the Control and Intervention groups, respectively. Out of the patients who had low disease activity at baseline (n=35), 28.6% (2/7) and 35.7% (10/28) were in remission at week 34 in the Control and Intervention groups, respectively.

Conclusion:  Partial descriptive data point towards a positive effect of BDM-complemented management compared to conventional practice only. This study will provide evidence on the clinical utility of personalized management of patients based on clinical assessment and biological drug monitoring (drug and anti-drug antibody levels) for adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis compared to management based on clinical assessments alone.


Disclosure: I. Gorostiza, None; E. Úcar Angulo, None; C. Gómez Arango, None; C. E. Perez, None; J. R. De Dios, None; B. Alvarez, None; A. Ruibal Escribano, None; C. Stoye, None; M. Vasques, None; J. Belzunegui Otano, None; A. Escobar, None; Z. Trancho, None; A. Ruiz del Agua, Progenika, 3; L. Del Rio, Progenika, 3; A. Martínez, Progenika, 3; D. Nagore, Progenika, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gorostiza I, Úcar Angulo E, Gómez Arango C, Perez CE, De Dios JR, Alvarez B, Ruibal Escribano A, Stoye C, Vasques M, Belzunegui Otano J, Escobar A, Trancho Z, Ruiz del Agua A, Del Rio L, Martínez A, Nagore D. Prospective, Intervention, Multicenter Study of Utility of Biologic Drug Monitoring with Respect to the Efficacy and Cost of Adalimumab Tapering in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases (34-week descriptive data) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-intervention-multicenter-study-of-utility-of-biologic-drug-monitoring-with-respect-to-the-efficacy-and-cost-of-adalimumab-tapering-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-34-week-descriptiv/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-intervention-multicenter-study-of-utility-of-biologic-drug-monitoring-with-respect-to-the-efficacy-and-cost-of-adalimumab-tapering-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-34-week-descriptiv/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology