ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2930

Prospective Comparison of Remission and Lupus Low Disease Activity State – Effect on Disease Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Vera Golder1, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake2, Molla Huq3, Worawit Louthrenoo4, Shue-Fen Luo5, Yeong-Jian Wu6, Aisha Lateef7, Sargunan Sockalingam8, Susan Morton9, Sandra V. Navarra10, Leonid Zamora11, Laniyati Hamijoyo12, Yasuhiro Katsumata13, Masayoshi Harigai14, Madelynn Chan15, Sean O'Neill16, Fiona Goldblatt17, Chak Sing Lau18, Zhan-Guo Li19, Alberta Y. Hoi2, Mandana Nikpour20 and Eric Morand21, 1School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3The University of Melbourne at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 5Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 6Chang Gung University, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, 7Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, National University Hospital of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 8University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia, 10University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines, 11Rheumatology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines, 12University of Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 13Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, 14Tokyo Women's Medical University, Division of Epidemiology and Pharmacoepidemiology of Rheumatic Diseases, Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo, Japan, 15Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 16University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 17Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 18Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 19Rheum/Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China, 20The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 21Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: outcome measures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Title: 6W010 ACR Abstract: SLE–Clinical V: Biomarkers, Criteria, & Outcomes (2928–2933)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) group has proposed multiple definitions of remission, but these are infrequently attained and have not previously been evaluated in relation to protection from damage accrual in a prospective study. In contrast, the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) is potentially more attainable, and has been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the attainability and effect of LLDAS and remission on outcomes in a prospective multicenter study.

Methods: A prospective multinational cohort study was undertaken in 13 centres between 2013-2017. Time dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare LLDAS and DORIS definitions of remission in terms of impact on disease flares and damage accrual. All eight DORIS remission definitions include a clinical SLEDAI-2K of 0, and PGA (0-3) <0.5, whilst varying in allowing for serological activity, prednisolone and immunosuppressants.

Results: 1735 SLE patients (meeting ACR or SLICC criteria) were recruited, and followed for (mean ± SD) 2.2 ± 0.9 years, totalling 12,534 visits. LLDAS was achieved in 6922 visits (54.6%). In contrast, remission was achieved in 140 (1.1%) to 1952 (15.4%) visits depending on definition. LLDAS attainment at any visit was associated with significantly reduced subsequent flare (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.56-0.76, p<0.001) and damage accrual (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.70, p<0.001). In contrast, considering every visit, only the least stringent remission definition (allowing serology, prednisolone ≤5mg, and immunosuppression) could be demonstrated to be associated with significantly reduced subsequent damage accrual (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.39-0.88, p 0.01). Only remission definitions including serological remission were significantly associated with reduction in subsequent flares. Using a cut off of ≥50% of observed time meeting a given definition, LLDAS resulted in a two-fold reduction in risk of flare and damage accrual (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.42-0.58, p<0.001; HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68, p<0.001, respectively), while only the least stringent remission definition, or the related definition excluding serology (13.6% visits), were significantly protective against damage (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83, p 0.003; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99, p 0.05, respectively). When attained for ≥50% of observed time, all but one remission definition was significantly associated with reduced flares.

Conclusion: In this first-ever prospective study, LLDAS was markedly more attainable than any remission definition, whilst still conferring significant protection against flares and damage accrual. Among the remission definitions only the least stringent could be shown to be associated with significant reduction in damage accrual, likely reflecting a low frequency of remission attainment overall, and normal serology was required for protection from subsequent flare. LLDAS is a valid treatment target for SLE which is more achievable than remission.


Disclosure: V. Golder, None; R. Kandane-Rathnayake, None; M. Huq, None; W. Louthrenoo, None; S. F. Luo, None; Y. J. Wu, None; A. Lateef, None; S. Sockalingam, None; S. Morton, None; S. V. Navarra, None; L. Zamora, None; L. Hamijoyo, None; Y. Katsumata, None; M. Harigai, None; M. Chan, None; S. O'Neill, None; F. Goldblatt, None; C. S. Lau, None; Z. G. Li, None; A. Y. Hoi, None; M. Nikpour, Actelion, GSK, Pfizer, BMS, Eli Lilly, UCB, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, 2, 5; E. Morand, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Golder V, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Huq M, Louthrenoo W, Luo SF, Wu YJ, Lateef A, Sockalingam S, Morton S, Navarra SV, Zamora L, Hamijoyo L, Katsumata Y, Harigai M, Chan M, O'Neill S, Goldblatt F, Lau CS, Li ZG, Hoi AY, Nikpour M, Morand E. Prospective Comparison of Remission and Lupus Low Disease Activity State – Effect on Disease Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-comparison-of-remission-and-lupus-low-disease-activity-state-effect-on-disease-outcomes-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prospective-comparison-of-remission-and-lupus-low-disease-activity-state-effect-on-disease-outcomes-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology