ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0185

Promoting Health Services Research Rigor and Reproducibility using CodeMapper: A novel tool for harmonization, collaboration, and precision

Emily Holladay1, Nick McCormick2, Robert Matthews3, Shanette Daigle4, Fenglong Xie5, Tapan Mehta1 and Jeffrey Curtis6, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 3Foundation for Advancing Science Technology Education and Research, Hoover, 4Foundation for Advancing Science, Technology, Education and Research (FASTER), Hoover, AL, 5The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 6Foundation for Advancing Science, Technology, Education and Research, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Data Management, Health Services Research

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0175–0198) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Medication, procedure, and diagnosis coding using structured data is fundamental to using real-world data to support clinical research, impacting cohort selection, patient recruitment, and outcome measurement. Source vocabulary systems (e.g. ICD-10-CM, HCPCS, RxNorm) are updated regularly, and incorporating these changes into existing code sets is essential yet challenging to manage, particularly in multidisciplinary settings. To address this need, we developed CodeMapper, an informatics tool designed to facilitate routine code updates and interdisciplinary collaboration. Our objective was to quantify medication, procedure, and diagnosis changes over time to assess the importance of maintaining updated code sets and provide a foundation for tool development.

Methods: We analyzed codes using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes from the National Center for Health Statistics and National Drug Codes (NDC) from First Data Bank (2015 to 2024). We also assessed Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from inception through 2024. We summarized code changes over time and visualized trends using figures.

Results: Between 2015 to 2024, 2,911 new HCPCS codes were added. These additions accounted for approximately 25% of all HCPCS codes (Figure 1). Similarly, notable increases in the number of NDC codes occurred from 2016-2024 with a median (IQR) of 20510.0 (20424.0, 22275.0) NDC codes added per two-year period (Figure 1). Similar changes were also observed for ICD-10-CM codes with a median of 377.5 (276.0, 833.0) additions, 54.5 (30.0, 214.5) deletions, and 38.5 (24.0, 184.5) revisions occurring annually (Figure 2). Revisions describe the changes occurring in naming, coding granularity, and numbering. Given these substantial changes over time in standardized coding systems, we developed CodeMapper, a new web-based informatics tool integrating current and historical diagnostic, procedural, medication, and laboratory codes. With semi-annual source vocabulary updates, this tool helps maintain the code sets described above and offers the ability for interdisciplinary teams to collaborate and refine code lists for use in current or future research (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Regular updates to medical coding systems are essential to support accurate research findings. The potential to under-ascertain codes within structured data is high, particularly in multi-year longitudinal studies where code sets may be fixed at the time of protocol development yet will under-capture medications, procedures, and diagnoses as they change over time. Maintenance and integration of current and complete source vocabularies are critical for rigorous and generalizable clinical research both for trials and real-world evidence using observational electronic health record or claims data.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: E. Holladay: None; N. McCormick: None; R. Matthews: None; S. Daigle: None; F. Xie: None; T. Mehta: Heart Rhythm Clinical Research Solutions., 2; J. Curtis: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Bendcare, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Glaxo Smith Kline, 2, 5, Horizon, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Scipher medicine, 2, 5, SetPoint, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Holladay E, McCormick N, Matthews R, Daigle S, Xie F, Mehta T, Curtis J. Promoting Health Services Research Rigor and Reproducibility using CodeMapper: A novel tool for harmonization, collaboration, and precision [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/promoting-health-services-research-rigor-and-reproducibility-using-codemapper-a-novel-tool-for-harmonization-collaboration-and-precision/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/promoting-health-services-research-rigor-and-reproducibility-using-codemapper-a-novel-tool-for-harmonization-collaboration-and-precision/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology