ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1158

Privacy-Preserving Linkage between the Arthritispower Registry and Commercial Payer Claims Data to Support Comparative Effectiveness and Outcomes Research

W. Benjamin Nowell1, Jeffrey R. Curtis2, Lang Chen2, Biruk Eshete3, Abiy Agiro3, Xiaoxue Chen3, Jennifer Ostertag-Stretch3, Toan Ong4, Kelly Clayton1, Kelly Gavigan1 and Kevin Haynes3, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3HealthCore, Wilmington, DE, 4University of Colorado, Denver, CO

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: PRO and patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II: Gout, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Pain, and Function

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Integration of registry information with administrative claims data may be used to conduct patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), including comparative effectiveness and safety studies, and to improve the quality of clinical care. While a variety of methods exist to link data, the unique requirements for linking data provided by patients in a research registry to claims data held by health plans and payers may present unique obstacles. These challenges are even greater if 1) no patient identifiers can be directly shared, and 2) no unique identifiers (e.g. social security number) are acceptable for use given privacy concerns. We evaluated results of a method to link data from a patient registry to the clinical outcomes research subsidiary of a large commercial payer under these two constraints.

Methods:

A novel, preliminarily validated encryption algorithm using a secure HIPAA-compliant cryptographic one-way hash function was developed to convert a vector of non-unique patient identifiers (first name, last name, sex, date of birth) into unique hashed identifiers. Both the ArthritisPower registry and HealthCore, Anthem Inc.’s research subsidiary, utilized the hashing algorithm and exchanged only these identifiers; exact match on the hashed identifiers was required. The diagnoses self-reported by patients in the ArthritisPower registry were compared with ICD9/10-based diagnoses in the claims data for the same conditions, and similar autoimmune conditions, varying the amount of health plan coverage available (any, or >5 years), using both a sensitive (>=1 outpatient diagnosis) and a more specific (>=2 diagnoses from relevant specialist) claims-based definition, and considering whether the condition matched exactly vs. matched a broader set of inflammatory arthritis diagnosis codes (e.g. RA, PsA, ankylosing spondylitis).

Results:

Of 11,343 ArthritisPower registry participants enrolled at time of data integration with any health condition, 19.1% (n=2166) were linked to Anthem claims data with no minimum coverage duration requirement; 1600 were commercially insured. Of these, mean (SD) age was 49 (10.7), 93% women, and they resided in the Northeast (12%), Midwest (29%), South (37%) and West (22%). Among patients with more than 5 years of coverage and who met the ICD9/10 definition for the computable phenotypes of RA, PsA or psoriasis, confirmation rates varied modestly according to the various parameters permuted (Table).

Conclusion:

Information from a patient-led arthritis research registry where in-person visits are not required can be linked to data from a research subsidiary of a large commercial payer using a hashing algorithm that does not require unique identifiers nor sharing of individual patient information. Ongoing work is underway to maximize the accuracy of linkage and confirmation rates using various approaches.


Disclosure: W. B. Nowell, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,Merck & Co., 1,Pfizer, Inc., 1, 2,AbbVie Inc., 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2,Eli Lilly and Co., 1, 2,Janssen, 1,Novartis, 2; J. R. Curtis, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Corrona, UCB, Myriad, 2, 5; L. Chen, None; B. Eshete, None; A. Agiro, None; X. Chen, None; J. Ostertag-Stretch, None; T. Ong, None; K. Clayton, None; K. Gavigan, Global Healthy Living Foundation (GHLF), 3; K. Haynes, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nowell WB, Curtis JR, Chen L, Eshete B, Agiro A, Chen X, Ostertag-Stretch J, Ong T, Clayton K, Gavigan K, Haynes K. Privacy-Preserving Linkage between the Arthritispower Registry and Commercial Payer Claims Data to Support Comparative Effectiveness and Outcomes Research [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/privacy-preserving-linkage-between-the-arthritispower-registry-and-commercial-payer-claims-data-to-support-comparative-effectiveness-and-outcomes-research/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/privacy-preserving-linkage-between-the-arthritispower-registry-and-commercial-payer-claims-data-to-support-comparative-effectiveness-and-outcomes-research/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology