ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 935

Primary Care Preventive Services in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to Others in Their Community

Cristina Drenkard1, Kimberley Rask2, Gaobin Bao3, Gnanesh Patel4, Suparna Bagchi5 and S. Sam Lim6, 1Medicine, Div Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 2Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 3Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 4Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 5Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, 6Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Rheumatic Disease II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic illness frequently complicated by infections, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. Primary care preventive services (PCS) are recommended to prevent these complications among individuals at risk. Yet, the utilization of PCS in the US may be more challenging for SLE patients, especially given the worse SLE outcomes among ethnic minorities and those with low socioeconomic status. We compared the likelihood that a cohort of SLE patients from a large metropolitan area in Atlanta, GA, US received recommended PCS relative to the baseline rates of PCS in the same community from a national population-based survey.

Methods: The Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) is a cohort of validated SLE patients predominantly derived from the Georgia Lupus Registry, a population-based registry of lupus in the Atlanta metropolitan area. GOAL includes the full sociodemographic spectrum of SLE patients and collects self-reported measures on health care utilization and health conditions. Eleven self-reported PCS were assessed in 765 SLE GOAL participants (94% women, 78% blacks,18% uninsured) and 3 representative samples of individuals (9040 from the same community, 938 of them with diabetes, and 620 with CVD) derived from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We compared the proportion of eligible SLE and BRFSS individuals who received the recommended PCS on (1) immunizations, (2) cancer screening, (3) cholesterol monitoring, (4) counseling on medications and lifestyle modifications for high blood pressure (HBP), and (5) all 11 recommended PCS.

Results:

                                                                                Eligible SLE and BRFSS participants who received recommended PCS   

PCS

SLE
% (95% CI)

Community
% (95% CI)

Diabetes
% (95% CI)

CVD
% (95% CI)

Immunizations

(Influenza and/or

Pneumococcal vaccine)

45 (41-49)

19 (18–21)

33 (29–37)

38 (33–43)

Cancer Screening

(Pap smear and/or mammogram,

and/or colonoscopy)

78 (74-81)

77 (76–79)

70 (65–75)

70 (64–76)

Cholesterol Monitoring

65 (62-69)

81 (79–83)

87 (81–92)

90 (84–93)

Counseling on HBP

(Drugs and/or 4 lifestyle modifications)

48 (43-53)

38 (34–42)

50 (43–58)

42 (33–51)

 All 11 recommended PCS

19 (17-22)

22 (21–23)

23 (20–27)

26 (22–31)

      

Conclusion: Although only 45% of eligible SLE participants received the recommended immunizations, the proportion was higher than in the community or those with diabetes, and similar to CVD. Over 78% of SLE received complete cancer screening services, which was comparable to the other BRFSS groups. However, only 65% of SLE participants were adequately screened for cholesterol, a lower proportion than in the BRFSS samples. Counseling on hypertension was reported by less than 50% of SLE, similar to the BRFSS groups. Less than 20% of SLE responders received all recommended PCS. Further research is needed to identify factors associated with gaps in the utilization of primary care among SLE patients.

 


Disclosure:

C. Drenkard,
None;

K. Rask,
None;

G. Bao,
None;

G. Patel,
None;

S. Bagchi,
None;

S. S. Lim,

Human Genome Sciences, Inc.,

2,

GlaxoSmithKline,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/primary-care-preventive-services-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-compared-to-others-in-their-community/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology