ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1079

Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Gihyun Myung1, Lindsy J. Forbess2, Mariko L. Ishimori2, Sumeet Chugh1, Daniel Wallace1 and Michael H. Weisman1, 1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 2Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outcomes

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Although the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (0.5-1%) and QT prolongation (7%) is well studied in the general population, little is known regarding arrhythmias in SLE. The aim of this project is to determine the prevalence of arrhythmias in a SLE population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed electrocardiograms (ECGs) of SLE patients seen in inpatient, outpatient and emergency department settings over a 10-year time frame at a single academic center. Abnormal ECG findings were confirmed by an electrophysiologist. ECGs were categorized as abnormal if arrhythmias or QT prolongation (QTc ≥460ms for women; ≥450ms for men) were present. Sinus bradycardia, 1st degree AV block, and sinus tachycardia were not considered arrhythmias but were recorded. Arrhythmias were also ascertained through review of ICD9 codes for the subset of SLE patients with available ECGs.

Results

Of 1,139 SLE patients, 235 had available ECGs.  160 were white (68%), 33 black (14%), 27 Asian (12%), and 15 Hispanic (6%). 217 were female (92%), 18 (8%) male, and the average age was 52 ± 15 (average ± SD). Through ECG review, 6% had tachyarrhythmias (3% with atrial fibrillation) and 17% had QT prolongation (Table 1). None had bradyarrhythmias. Through ICD9 code examination, more had tachyarrthythmias (15%), including atrial fibrillation (9%), compared with direct ECG review. 35 of 53 abnormal ECGs (66%) were obtained in the inpatient setting, 11 (21%) in the outpatient setting, and 7 (13%) in the emergency department. The most common ECG indication was chest pain (12% of abnormal and 16% of normal ECGs). 

Conclusion

Sinus tachycardia was the most common ECG finding among our SLE patients. Compared to the general population, our SLE patients had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation. This is likely an underestimation of the true arrhythmia prevalence, given that review of ICD9 codes revealed an even higher rate of tachyarrhythmias compared to direct ECG review. As QT prolongation was common in our SLE patients, it is important to be vigilant about drug interactions and the electrophysiologic effects of various medications, such as antibiotics, in these patients. Further prospective study of arrhythmias, their outcomes, and underlying causative factors (such as medication use and disease severity) in SLE patients is warranted.

Table 1. Prevalence of Arrhythmias in SLE patients after Review of ECGs and ICD9 codes

 

Arrhythmia

Type of Review, N (%)

 

ECG, N=235

ICD9 Code, N=235

 

Tachyarrhythmia

13 (6)

35 (15)

Atrial fibrillation

7 (3)

21 (9)

Atrial flutter

2 (1)

6 (3)

Atrial tachycardia

2 (1)

8 (3)

Supraventricular tachycardia

2 (1)

3(1)

Paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia

0 (0)

8 (3)

QT Prolongation

40 (17)

4 (2)

Sinus Tachycardia

42 (18)

Not Available

Sinus Bradycardia

34 (14)

Not Available

1st Degree AV Block

6 (3)

3 (1)


Disclosure:

G. Myung,
None;

L. J. Forbess,
None;

M. L. Ishimori,
None;

S. Chugh,
None;

D. Wallace,
None;

M. H. Weisman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-of-cardiac-arrhythmias-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology