ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0166

Prevalence and Impact of Unacceptable Symptom State Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the National Psoriasis Foundation’s 2019 Annual Survey

Alexis Ogdie1, George Gondo2, Joseph Merola3, Stacie Bell4 and Alice Gottlieb5, 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, OR, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Newton, MA, 4National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, 5Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: depression, Disease Activity, Psoriatic arthritis, quality of life, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: RA, Spondyloarthritis, & OA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite many efficacious therapies for PsA, many patients do not achieve remission.  Ongoing disease activity leads to many downstream effects including diminished functional ability, reduction in social interaction and in some cases depression. Furthermore, depression may be associated with ongoing symptoms that can be attributed to PsA. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ‘unacceptable’ symptom states among patients with PsA and to examine the association with being in an unacceptable symptom state with depression and impaired social interaction.

Methods: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) surveyed a random, stratified sample of individuals with psoriatic disease in the US from the NPF’s constituent database.  Patients were active members of the NPF within the past 2 years, age >=18, carried a self-reported diagnosis of psoriasis or PsA and had an active email address or phone number.  The presence of acceptable vs unacceptable level of disease impact of PsA was assessed using the established patient acceptable symptom state for the PsAID-9 (< =4 on a scale of 0-10). Severity of psoriasis was defined by body surface area (BSA, Mild < 3%, Moderate to Severe ≥ 3%) as reported by patients using the Patient Report of Extent of Psoriasis Involvement (PREPI). Linear regression analyses were conducted to compare outcomes of individuals with acceptable level of PsA activity with those who have unacceptable level of PsA activity while adjusting for severity of PsO. Outcomes of interest were depression and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Depression was assessed by a two-stage assessment process utilizing the PhQ-2 and PhQ-9. The PhQ-2 is utilized in this analysis. Ability to participate in social roles and activities was assessed by the PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Role and Activities-SF4a. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS Ver 26 and ANOVA and linear regression analyses were conducted in STATA SE Ver 9.

Results: Among 23,340 patients sent a survey, 1,570 individuals completed the survey, including 834 who reported being diagnosed with PsA by a healthcare provider and 801 (96.0%) completed the PSAID. Among individuals who self-reported diagnosis of PsA and completed the PsAID-9, 59.6% reported unacceptable level of disease activity (PSAID >4) and 40.4% reported acceptable level of disease activity. After adjusting for age, sex, and severity of PsO, statistically significant differences were found between individuals with unacceptable level of PsA activity and acceptable level of PsA activity for depression [2.56 (SD 2.00) vs 0.08 (SD 1.25, p≤.001] and ability to participate in social roles and activities [mean T-scores 44.56 (SD 6.83) vs 55.46 (SD 6.99), p≤.001].

Conclusion: Not being in a patient acceptable symptom state is common in this US-based population of patients with PsA and is associated with significant decrements in social activity and increase prevalence of depression. Being monitored by a dermatologist or rheumatologist was associated with an increased likelihood of being in a patient acceptable symptom state.

Table 1 – Patient characteristics

Table 2. Mean differences in social activity and depression among those in a patient acceptable symptom state compared to those not in PASS.


Disclosure: A. Ogdie, abbvie, 1, amgen, 1, bms, 1, celgene, 1, corona, 1, lilly, 1, janssen, 1, novartis, 1, 2, novartis, 1, pfizer, 1; G. Gondo, None; J. Merola, AbbVie, 9, Merck, 9, Dermavant, 9, Eli Lilly, 9, Novartis, 9, Janssen, 9, UCB, 9, Samumed, 9, Celgene, 9, Sanofi, 9, Regeneron, 9, GlaxoSmithKline, 9, Sun Pharmaceutical, 9, Almirall, 9, Biogen, 9, Pfizer, 9, Incyte, 9, Aclaris, 9, LEO Pharma, 9; S. Bell, None; A. Gottlieb, Janssen, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Xbiotech, 2, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Beiersdorf, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 5, Avotres Therapeutics, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Gondo G, Merola J, Bell S, Gottlieb A. Prevalence and Impact of Unacceptable Symptom State Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the National Psoriasis Foundation’s 2019 Annual Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-impact-of-unacceptable-symptom-state-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-national-psoriasis-foundations-2019-annual-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-impact-of-unacceptable-symptom-state-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-national-psoriasis-foundations-2019-annual-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology