ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2809

Prevalence and Clinical Presentation Of Lyme Arthritis In a Large Cohort Of Patients With Recent-Onset Arthritis

Jeska K. De Vries-Bouwstra1, Nathalie D. van Burgel2, Tom Vreeswijk2, Aloys C.M. Kroes2, Tom W.J. Huizinga1 and Annette H. M. van der Helm- van Mil1, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lyme disease and serologic tests

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Infection Related Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Lyme arthritis is a relatively uncommon form of arthritis that is relevant to identify because it requires specific therapy. The presents study aimed to describe 1. the seroprevalence of Lyme antibodies, 2. the prevalence of Lyme arthritis, and 3. the diagnostics accuracy of serologic testing for Borreliae among patients with recent-onset arthritis in The Netherlands. Methods:

The present study included all patients who presented to the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic during the period of February 1993 to April 1997 (cohort 1) and the period July 2003 to June 2008 (cohort 2). In sera from cohort 1, antibodies against Borreliae were detected by the IgG and IgM flagellin-Enzyme Immune Assay (EIA). All available positive samples were retested with the IgG/IgM C6 EIA. In cohort 2, the C6 Lyme EIA Kit was used. All positive EIA results from both cohorts were confirmed by the Borrelia Europe LINE blot and a second EIA, the Liaison® Borrelia burgdorferi IgG (VlsE) and IgM (VlsE+OspC). The clinical records of the patients with positive or equivocal serology were thoroughly studied; Lyme disease was not diagnosed in case of a clear alternative diagnosis.  The proportion of patients with Lyme arthritis was determined, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of Borrelia serology. Results:

Of 1180 patients with recent-onset arthritis, 53 patients had positive serology, indicating a seroprevalence of 4,5% (Figure 1 and 2). Eight cases of definite Lyme arthritis (0.7%) were identified  These patients were characterized by younger age, and typically presented with monoarthritis or oligoarthritis including a knee. Retrospectively, possible Lyme arthritis was diagnosed in seven (0,6%) patients.  In the remaining patients with positive or equivocal serology different clinical diagnoses were made (rheumatoid arthritis n= 14; spondylarthritis n= 11; systemic inflammatory disease n= 3; osteoarthritis n= 2; other n=8). Based on the low prevalence of Lyme arthritis, the positive predictive value of serology for Lyme disease was low (10-28%). By selecting patients with a higher prior chance of Lyme disease, eg in patients presenting with an oligo- or monoarthritis of large joints, the positive predictive value increased to 67%. Conclusion:

The prevalence of Lyme arthritis among patients with recent-onset arthritis in The Netherlands is low, 0.7%. Although sensitivity and specificity of Lyme serology are reported to be good, serologic testing for Lyme arthritis contributes poorly to clinical decision making in patient with recent-onset arthritis due to the low a priori chance on Lyme arthritis.


Disclosure:

J. K. De Vries-Bouwstra,
None;

N. D. van Burgel,
None;

T. Vreeswijk,
None;

A. C. M. Kroes,
None;

T. W. J. Huizinga,
None;

A. H. M. van der Helm- van Mil,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-clinical-presentation-of-lyme-arthritis-in-a-large-cohort-of-patients-with-recent-onset-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology