ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1034

Presence of Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies Is Associated with Better Treatment Response to Abatacept but Not to TNF Inhibitors in Patients with RA: A Meta-Analysis

E Alemao1, R Postema2, Y Elbez3, C Mamane4 and Axel Finckh5, 1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, 3Excelya, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 4Mapi, London, United Kingdom, 5University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: anti-CCP antibodies, meta-analysis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Health Services Research Poster II: Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The association between anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status and erosions, as well as response to TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, has been explored.1,2 Results based on a large US RA registry study have suggested that anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CPP; a surrogate for ACPA) positivity predicts better clinical responses to abatacept, but not to TNFi.3 The objective of this study was to investigate whether ACPA status is associated with clinical responses to abatacept or to TNFi in RA, in the published literature Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify published studies and conference abstracts estimating biologic DMARD response according to ACPA status. The SLR was supplemented by additional studies that were identified through expert input. Mantel–Haenszel meta-analysis methods were used to pool risk ratios (RRs) based on ACPA status. In the base-case, response to therapy was assessed using the EULAR response as the primary outcome, while a scenario analysis assessed response by combining various definitions including ACR20 and EULAR for abatacept, and ACR20, DAS28 and EULAR for TNFi therapy. Results: Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis: 4 for abatacept, 14 for TNFi and 1 for both treatments. The base-case analysis included 4 of the abatacept and 6 of the TNFi studies and showed a statistically significant positive association between ACPA positivity and EULAR response for patients treated with abatacept (RR 1.13 [95% CI 1.00, 1.26]; Figure 1), while ACPA positivity was associated with lower EULAR responses to TNFi therapy (RR 0.92 [95% CI 0.86, 0.98]; Figure 2). For the scenario analyses, in which all definitions of response were pooled, the results were consistent with base-case for abatacept (RR 1.18 [95% CI 1.30, 1.35]), while for TNFi therapy, no significant difference by ACPA status was observed (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.86, 1.10]).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that ACPA-positive RA patients are more likely to achieve response to abatacept treatment compared to ACPA-negative patients. Additionally, the analysis demonstrates that there is no association between ACPA status and response to TNFi therapy, consistent with the findings of previously published studies.1,3 1.    Lv Q, et al. PLoS One 2014;9:e89442. 2.    Jilani AA and Mackworth-Young CG. Int J Rheumatol 2015;2015:72810. 3.    Harrold LR, et al. J Rheum 2017 [Epub ahead of print].

86897p_Fig_01   86897p_Fig_02  


Disclosure: E. Alemao, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; R. Postema, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; Y. Elbez, None; C. Mamane, Mapi, 3,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5; A. Finckh, AbbVie, A2BIO, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alemao E, Postema R, Elbez Y, Mamane C, Finckh A. Presence of Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies Is Associated with Better Treatment Response to Abatacept but Not to TNF Inhibitors in Patients with RA: A Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/presence-of-anti-cyclic-citrullinated-peptide-antibodies-is-associated-with-better-treatment-response-to-abatacept-but-not-to-tnf-inhibitors-in-patients-with-ra-a-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/presence-of-anti-cyclic-citrullinated-peptide-antibodies-is-associated-with-better-treatment-response-to-abatacept-but-not-to-tnf-inhibitors-in-patients-with-ra-a-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology