ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2019

Preliminary Definition of a Positive MRI for Active Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints Typical of Axial Spondyloarthritis

Walter Maksymowych1, Xenofon Baraliakos2, Ulrich Weber3, Pedro M Machado4, Susanne J Pedersen5, Joachim Sieper6, Stephanie Wichuk1, Denis Poddubnyy7, Martin Rudwaleit8, Désirée van der Heijde9, Robert Landewé10, Joel Paschke11, Mikkel Østergaard12 and Robert G Lambert13, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 3University of South Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 4University College London, London, United Kingdom, 5Rigshospitalet University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 7Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 8Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Germany, 9Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 10Amsterdam University Medical Center & Zuyderland Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11CARE Arthritis, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 12Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13University of Alberta and CARE Arthritis, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Diagnostic criteria, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes III: Imaging in SpA (2018–2022)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 5:00PM-5:50PM

Background/Purpose: The ASAS definition of a positive MRI for inflammation (ASAS-MRI+) is intended for classification of patients as having axSpA but is often misused for diagnostic purposes. This is problematic because bone marrow edema (BME) in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) may occur in 20-40% of both healthy individuals and those with mechanical back disorders when only the quantitative aspect of the definition is applied (presence of BME in ≥2 locations on one slice or one location in ≥2 slices). The definition also requires that BME is considered “highly suggestive” of SpA but interpretation of this qualitative component may vary according to expertise.  Revised definitions of MRI lesions in the SIJ have been validated by 7 readers from the ASAS-MRI group on images from the ASAS Classification Cohort1-3. We aimed to identify quantitative cut-offs based on numbers of slices and SIJ quadrants that define a positive MRI for active lesions typical of axSpA, the gold standard being majority central reader decision as to the presence of a definite active lesion typical of axSpA with high confidence.

Methods: MRI active lesions meeting ASAS definitions from 160 cases were recorded by 7 ASAS-MRI readers in an eCRF that comprises global assessment (Is there an active lesion typical of axSpA (yes/no) and degree of confidence (-4 (lesion absent) to +4 (lesion present)), and detailed scoring of lesions per SIJ quadrant and per slice. Detailed scoring was based only on assessment of DICOM images. We calculated sensitivity and specificity for numbers of SIJ quadrants and consecutive slices with BME where a majority of readers (≥4/7) agreed as to the presence of an active lesion typical of axSpA with high confidence (≥ +3). We selected cut-offs with ≥95% specificity. These cut-offs were analyzed for their predictive utility for rheumatologist diagnosis of axSpA at follow up (average of 4.4 years) by calculating positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and selecting those cut-offs with PPV of ≥95% and comparable predictive utility with global MRI assessment. Both specificity of ≥95% for a definite lesion as well as a PPV of ≥95% were considered requirements for preliminary designation of MRI lesion cut-offs defining a positive MRI for active lesions.

Results: Active lesions typical of axSpA were observed by majority read in 39 (35.8%) of 109 cases diagnosed with axSpA, and 1 (2.0%) of 49 cases without axSpA and 26 cases were assigned a high degree of confidence (≥ +3) by a majority of readers. Cut-offs achieving specificity of ≥95% for a definite active lesion were BME at the same location in ≥3 consecutive slices (sensitivity 100%) and BME at any location in ≥4 SIJ quadrants (sensitivity 100%) (Table 1). Both of these cut-offs had very high positive predictive values (≥95%) for diagnosis of axSpA in cases diagnosed by the rheumatologist after 4.4 years follow up (Table 2).

Conclusion: ASAS-defined BME at the same location in ≥3 consecutive slices or in ≥4 SIJ quadrants at any location, are high priority candidates for defining an MRI active lesion typical of axSpA. This will require similar assessment in additional axSpA cohorts.

  1. Maksymowych et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:1550-8.
  2. Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 777-83
  3. Maksymowych et al. Ann Rheum Dis May 05 2020


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, AbbVie, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5; U. Weber, None; P. Machado, Abbvie, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Pfizer, 8; S. Pedersen, None; J. Sieper, AbbVie, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, Lilly, 8, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, 8; S. Wichuk, None; D. Poddubnyy, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, BioCad, 5, Gilead, 5, GSK, 5, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 8; M. Rudwaleit, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Celgene, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 5, 8; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Cyxone, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Astellas, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi-Sankyo, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Takeda, 5, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 3, Eisai, 5; R. Landewé, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Rheumatology Consultancy BV, 1, Ablynx, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Gilead, 5, Novo Nordisk, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Schering, 2, 5, 8, TiGenix, 5; J. Paschke, None; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Hospira, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, Orion, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; R. Lambert, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Baraliakos X, Weber U, Machado P, Pedersen S, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Paschke J, Østergaard M, Lambert R. Preliminary Definition of a Positive MRI for Active Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints Typical of Axial Spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-definition-of-a-positive-mri-for-active-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-typical-of-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-definition-of-a-positive-mri-for-active-lesions-in-the-sacroiliac-joints-typical-of-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology