ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0447

Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Exposed to Guselkumab: Review of Cases Reported to the Manufacturer’s Global Safety Database

Connie Lin1, Anja Geldhof2, Mauricio Ballina3, Hetal Patel4 and Hewei Li5, 1Janssen R&D US, Horsham, PA, 2Director Postmarketing Commitments, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Actelion Research & Development, Basel, Switzerland, Gewerbestrasse, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland, 4Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Naperville, IL, 5Janssen Pharmaceutical, Hopewell Township, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, pregnancy, Psoriatic arthritis, registry, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Data pertaining to the use of biologics in immunologic diseases are limited on their use during pregnancy. Guselkumab (GUS) is a human IgG1λ mAb approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) and active PsA; it is currently in clinical development for IBD. IgG1λ antibodies are known to cross the placental barrier and have the potential to affect pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women exposed to GUS.

Methods: Cumulative data from the Janssen Global Safety Database reported through 12 July 2023 are summarized descriptively for medically confirmed and unconfirmed pregnancies with maternal exposure to GUS before conception (within 3 months prior to confirmed pregnancy), during the first trimester (T1), after the first trimester (T2, T3), or any time during confirmed pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes were classified as live births with or without congenital anomalies; spontaneous abortions; elective terminations, stillbirths, or unspecified abortions with or without fetal defects; fetal deaths; ectopic pregnancies; induced/missed abortions; or pregnancies that are ongoing or that have no reported outcome.

Results: Overall, 590 pregnancy events (twins=2; triplets=1) in 586 women exposed to GUS have been reported prospectively (N=505) or retrospectively (N=85) (Table). When indication was reported (N=412), GUS was administered for PsO (90.0% [371/412]); PsA (2.2% [9/412]), both PsO and PsA (3.4% [14/412]), and IBD (1.5% [6/412]). Of the pregnancies reporting guselkumab trimester exposure (N=189), exposure to GUS occurred before conception (14.3% [27/189]), during T1 (77.8% [147/189]), during T2 or T3 (5.3% [10/189]), or any time during pregnancy (2.6% [5/189]). Mean duration of GUS exposure prior to pregnancy in known cases (N=158) was 385 days (median, 238 [0–1717 days]). Where reported (N=349), mean maternal age was 32.0 years (median, 32 [19–56 years]). Outcomes were reported for 30.2% (178/590) of pregnancy events, which included live birth (63.5% [113/178]), spontaneous abortion (22.5% [40/178]), elective termination (no fetal defects or unknown) (6.7% [12/178]), ectopic pregnancy (3.4% [6/178]), induced abortion (1.1% [2/178]), fetal death (1.1% [2/178]), and 1 event each (0.6%) of elective termination with a fetal defect, missed abortion, and unspecified abortion with fetal defects.

Conclusion: In pregnancy cases with known outcomes, rates of live births, spontaneous and elective/induced abortions, and congenital anomalies in women exposed to GUS ≤3 months before or during pregnancy were consistent with rates reported for the United States general population.1,2 These results are limited by missing data on pregnancy outcomes, maternal age statistics, concomitant medication use, other risk factors, and duration of GUS exposure. These findings represent a robust analysis of maternal GUS-exposed pregnancy outcomes to date, however, additional evidence is needed to increase understanding of the effects of GUS exposure on pregnancy outcomes across disease indications.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/data.html
2. Griebel CP, et al. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:1243-50

Supporting image 1

Table. Pregnancy Outcomes for Prospective and Retrospective Cases by Trimester of Exposure Reported With Maternal Guselkumab Exposure (N=586)


Disclosures: C. Lin: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; A. Geldhof: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; M. Ballina: Actelion Research & Development, 3; H. Patel: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; H. Li: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lin C, Geldhof A, Ballina M, Patel H, Li H. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Exposed to Guselkumab: Review of Cases Reported to the Manufacturer’s Global Safety Database [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pregnancy-outcomes-in-women-exposed-to-guselkumab-review-of-cases-reported-to-the-manufacturers-global-safety-database/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pregnancy-outcomes-in-women-exposed-to-guselkumab-review-of-cases-reported-to-the-manufacturers-global-safety-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology