ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1347

Predictors of Response in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol in the C-axSpAnd Study

Walter Maksymowych1, Thomas Kumke2, Simone Auteri3, Bengt Hoepken2, Lars Bauer2 and Martin Rudwaleit4, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2UCB Pharma, Monheim am Rhein, Germany, 3UCB Pharma, Milan, Italy, 4Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Biologicals, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Identification of predictive clinical factors of long-term treatment response in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) may contribute to improved management of patients with this chronic disease. Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is currently the only FDA-approved tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) for treatment of nr‑axSpA.1 We aim to identify whether any demographic or baseline characteristics of nr-axSpA patients from the C-axSpAnd study2 are predictive of achieving a clinical response after 1 year of CZP treatment.

Methods: C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) is a phase 3, interventional multicenter study including a completed 52‑week double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Full study design is reported elsewhere.2 Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response for the primary efficacy variable (ASDAS – major improvement [ASDAS-MI] at Week 52) and the main secondary efficacy variable (ASAS40 at Week 52) in patients randomized to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W). Predictive factors used in the model included demographic and baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes at Week 12. A p value ≤0.05 was required for forward selection into the model and p=0.1 for backward elimination from the model. Non-responder imputation was used to account for missing data or values collected after switching to open-label treatment. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for patients who had changes in their non-biologic background medication during the 52-week placebo-controlled phase.

Results: 159/317 patients were randomized to CZP 200 mg Q2W and 158/317 to placebo. Predictive factors identified for Week 52 ASDAS-MI in the CZP-treated patients included those who were positive for both presence of sacroiliitis on MRI (MRI+) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 (HLA+), those with a higher BASDAI at baseline, and those with a larger Week 12 improvement in ASDAS (Table 1). For ASAS40 response, MRI+/HLA‑B27+ was also identified as a predictor of Week 52 response, along with a lower baseline BASMI and larger Week 12 improvements in PtGADA and ASQoL and (Table 1). Sensitivity analysis identified the same predictors for ASDAS-MI and ASAS40, with the exception of change from baseline in PtGADA as a predictor of ASAS40. Sensitivity analysis also identified achievement of Week 12 ASAS40 as a predictor of Week 52 ASAS40. In placebo-treated patients, no meaningful predictors of response at Week 52 were identified.

Conclusion: Presence of sacroiliitis on MRI and HLA-B27 positivity were identified as consistent predictors of Week 52 response (ASDAS-MI and ASAS40) in nr‑axSpA patients treated with CZP. To our knowledge, this is the first report from an interventional 52-week placebo-controlled study in nr‑axSpA to identify objective clinical features, particularly the presence of sacroiliac joint inflammation, as being predictive of response.

References: 1. Ashrafi M. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020;32:321–9; 2. Deodhar A. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1101–11.


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, AbbVie, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5; T. Kumke, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; S. Auteri, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; B. Hoepken, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; L. Bauer, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; M. Rudwaleit, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Celgene, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Kumke T, Auteri S, Hoepken B, Bauer L, Rudwaleit M. Predictors of Response in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol in the C-axSpAnd Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-response-in-patients-with-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-receiving-certolizumab-pegol-in-the-c-axspand-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-response-in-patients-with-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-receiving-certolizumab-pegol-in-the-c-axspand-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology