ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2651

Predictors of Inadequate Response and Rapid Radiographic Progression in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate:  a Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Randomized, Controlled Trials of Adalimumab

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven2, Benjamin A. Wolfe3, Stefan Florentinus3, Su Chen3, Jessica L. Suboticki3 and Josef S. Smolen4, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California – San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center ARC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) is recommended as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1 However, information is limited regarding factors that may predict a poor response to MTX. The objective of this analysis was to identify predictors of MTX insufficient response (IR) and rapid radiographic progression (RRP) among pts with early RA receiving 6 months (mos) of MTX therapy.

Methods: In OPTIMA, pts with RA <1 year were randomized to receive either adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other wk (EOW) + MTX weekly (wkly) or placebo (PBO) EOW + MTX wkly for 26 wks. In PREMIER, pts with RA <3 years were randomized to receive ADA 40 mg EOW + MTX wkly, ADA 40 mg EOW + PBO wkly, or PBO EOW + MTX wkly for 2 years. This post hoc analysis compared MTX-IR pts, defined as not reaching stable low disease activity at wks 22 and 26 in OPTIMA and wks 20 and 24 in PREMIER, with pts who responded to initial MTX monotherapy. Comparisons were also made between pts who did and did not have RRP, assessed by an increase in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) of >1.5 from baseline (BL) to 6 mos. In pts with available data, backward logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of MTX-IR and RRP. Candidate predictors included BL demographics, time-averaged disease parameters for 3 time intervals (through 4 wks, 8 wks, and 12 wks of MTX exposure), and BL disease characteristics for the 12-wk interval. Time-averaged variables were calculated as area under the curve standardized for length of time interval.

Results: This analysis included 525 MTX-IR and 162 MTX responders. Mean disease duration at BL was 6 mo for both groups. The mean Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein; DAS28[CRP]) was 6.2 vs 5.6, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was 1.6 vs 1.3, and mTSS was 15.5 vs 12.2 for MTX-IR vs MTX responders, respectively. 171 pts experienced RRP, while 499 pts had no RRP; the mean disease duration at BL was 6 mo for both groups. The mean DAS28(CRP) was 6.4 vs 6.0 and HAQ-DI was 1.6 vs 1.5 for pts experiencing RRP vs pts who did not experience RRP, respectively. Mean mTSS at BL was higher for pts who experienced RRP (20.7) vs those who did not (12.4). Predictors of MTX-IR and RRP at 6 mos are shown in the Figure. Time-averaged HAQ-DI and DAS28(CRP) through 12 wks were the strongest predictors of both MTX-IR and RRP. Additionally, early clinical response (time-averaged DAS28[CRP]) at both 4 and 8 wks was predictive of both MTX-IR and RRP; however, time-averaged HAQ-DI was not predictive until wk 12.

Conclusion: In the OPTIMA and PREMIER trials, post-BL measures of RA activity appeared to be the strongest predictors of subsequent MTX-IR and of RRP. Pts who are likely to progress on MTX or have RRP may be good candidates for switching to earlier step-up therapy to reduce the likelihood of permanent bone damage.

Reference:

1.            Singh JA, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(1):1-25.

   


Disclosure: A. Kavanaugh, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 9; R. F. van Vollenhoven, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 2,AbbVie, Biotest, BMS, Crescendo, GSK, Centocor-Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, and Vertex, 5; B. A. Wolfe, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; S. Florentinus, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; S. Chen, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; J. L. Suboticki, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; J. S. Smolen, AbbVie, 2,AbbVie, 5,AbbVie, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kavanaugh A, van Vollenhoven RF, Wolfe BA, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Smolen JS. Predictors of Inadequate Response and Rapid Radiographic Progression in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate:  a Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Randomized, Controlled Trials of Adalimumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-inadequate-response-and-rapid-radiographic-progression-in-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-receiving-methotrexate-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-2-randomized-controlled-trials-of/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-inadequate-response-and-rapid-radiographic-progression-in-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-receiving-methotrexate-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-2-randomized-controlled-trials-of/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology