ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0926

Predictors of 1-Year Treatment Response Among Upadacitinib-Treated Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Post Hoc Analysis

Marina Magrey1, Sofia Ramiro2, Marcelo Medeiros Pinheiro3, Tianming Gao4, Fabiana Ganz4, In-Ho Song4, Ana Biljan5, Nigil Haroon6 and Martin Rudwaleit7, 1Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA, Richfield, OH, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 4AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5Abbvie Inc., Chicago, IL, 6Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7University of Bielefeld, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: clinical trial, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster I: Axial Spondyloarthritis (0908–0939)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy and safety among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase 2/3 SELECT-AXIS 1 study.1 If identified, early predictors of treatment response may inform treat-to-target strategies and optimize patient outcomes in AS. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether baseline (BL) characteristics or early responses predict clinical response at 1 year in UPA-treated patients with AS.

Methods: In the double-blind, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled SELECT-AXIS 1 study, patients received UPA 15 mg once daily or PBO until Week 14.1 At Week 14, PBO-treated patients switched to UPA 15 mg; patients originally randomized to UPA continued UPA therapy. Data from patients in the PBO and UPA arms were combined based on overall exposure to UPA; in the switch arm, exposure was defined as current visit minus 14 weeks (time of switch). The following outcomes were assessed at 1 year: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS[CRP]) inactive disease (ID; < 1.3) and low disease activity (LDA; < 2.1), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) partial remission (PR), and ≥40% improvement in ASAS criteria (ASAS40) response. The ability of BL characteristics, efficacy at Week 12, and back pain at Week 12 to predict 1-year outcomes was assessed using a univariable logistic regression model generating odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence intervals). LASSO regression was used to select the best-fitted multivariable model at Week 12 for each outcome measure.

Results: Among 187 patients who received or switched to UPA 15 mg, 70 (37.4%), 134 (71.7%), 73 (39.0%), and 131 (70.1%) achieved ASDAS(CRP) ID, ASDAS(CRP) LDA, ASAS PR, and ASAS40, respectively, following 1 year of UPA treatment. No meaningful predictors of 1-year efficacy outcomes were identified based on BL demographics (including disease duration, gender, and human leukocyte antigen B27 status) or BL disease characteristics (including ASDAS, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and CRP levels). In univariable analyses, Week 12 responses based on several disease activity measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including reductions (much better improvement [MBI], ≥30/≥50/≥70% reduction, or improvement) in back pain score, along with lower scores for back pain at Week 12, were associated with the achievement of ASDAS(CRP) ID, ASDAS(CRP) LDA, ASAS PR, and ASAS40 at 1 year (Figure). In a multivariable analysis, improvement from BL to Week 12 in back pain score consistently predicted several efficacy outcomes at 1 year.

Conclusion: In upadacitinib-treated patients with AS, improvement in PROs and reduction in back pain score at 12 weeks predicted clinical outcomes at 1 year.

Reference: 1. van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2019;394:2108–17.


Disclosures: M. Magrey, AbbVie, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Novartis, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Amgen, 5; S. Ramiro, AbbVie, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2, MSD, 5; M. Pinheiro, AbbVie, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2; T. Gao, AbbVie, 3, 11; F. Ganz, AbbVie, 3, 11; I. Song, AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Biljan, AbbVie, 3, 11; N. Haroon, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; M. Rudwaleit, AbbVie, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, AbbVie, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Novartis, 6, Novartis, 2, UCB Pharma, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Magrey M, Ramiro S, Pinheiro M, Gao T, Ganz F, Song I, Biljan A, Haroon N, Rudwaleit M. Predictors of 1-Year Treatment Response Among Upadacitinib-Treated Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Post Hoc Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-1-year-treatment-response-among-upadacitinib-treated-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-post-hoc-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-1-year-treatment-response-among-upadacitinib-treated-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-post-hoc-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology