ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1348

Predictors for Achievement of Low Disease Activity at Week 56 in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Who Received Upadacitinib 15 Mg Once Daily: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies

Daniel Aletaha1, Philip Mease2, Ralph Lippe3, Frank Behrens4, Derek Haaland5, Penélope Palominos6, Apinya Lertratanakul7, Michael Lane8, Kevin Douglas7, Peter Nash9 and Arthur Kavanaugh10, 1Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany, 4Rheumatology & Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Fraunhofer Cluster Immune-Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Fraunhofer Cluster Immune-Mediated Diseases (CIMD), Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 5McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario and The Waterside Clinic, Oro Medonte, ON, Canada, 6Division of Rheumatology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 7AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 8AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, 9Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, 10Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis I (1329–1363)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA) 15 mg once daily (QD) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for up to 56 weeks in the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 trials.1,2 This post hoc analysis of these studies explored the association of baseline characteristics and short-term responses with achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) low disease activity (LDA).

Methods: Data were pooled from patients with prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic (b) DMARDs (SELECT-PsA 1) or ≥1 bDMARDs (SELECT-PsA 2) originally randomized to UPA 15 mg QD. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between baseline characteristics and short-term (Week 12) responses with achieving MDA or DAPSA LDA at 56 weeks, sustained MDA (MDA at Weeks 36 and 56), or sustained DAPSA LDA (DAPSA LDA at Weeks 36, 44, and 56). Each predictor was evaluated separately in an initial model that included effects for study and concurrent non-bDMARD use. Odds ratios and concordance (c-)statistics were used to determine the predictive accuracy. Statistically significant predictors were then evaluated simultaneously using stepwise logistic regression with the Akaike Information Criterion for model-building.

Results: Of 640 patients included in the analysis, 40% and 47% achieved MDA and DAPSA LDA, respectively, at 56 weeks. Evaluated separately, younger age, sex (male), geographic region, lower weight, lower body mass index, the presence of dactylitis or enthesitis, and lower scores of Patient’s Assessment of Pain (Pt-Pain), Patient’s Global Assessment (PtGA), tender joint count in 68 joints, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were significant baseline predictors for achieving MDA and DAPSA LDA at Week 56. Lower Pt-Pain (Weeks 12–24) and PtGA (Weeks 16–24) scores were strongly predictive (c-statistics >0.8) of achieving MDA at Week 56, and both measures (from Week 8) were moderately predictive (c-statistics >0.7) of achieving DAPSA LDA. Evaluated simultaneously with several baseline characteristics, lower Pt-Pain and HAQ-DI scores at Week 12 were included in models strongly predictive of achieving MDA (c-statistic=0.850; Figure 1) and DAPSA LDA (c-statistic=0.840; Figure 2) at Week 56. For each 1-point increase in Pt-Pain or HAQ-DI scores at Week 12 (after adjusting for other effects in the model), patients were less likely to achieve MDA (by 32% or 56%, respectively) or DAPSA LDA (by 23% or 31%, respectively) at Week 56. Predictors for achieving sustained MDA and sustained DAPSA LDA were generally similar to those identified for achieving MDA and DAPSA LDA, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with PsA receiving UPA 15 mg, baseline characteristics and early responses strongly predicted achievement of MDA or DAPSA LDA at Week 56. This may guide considerations of treatment targets in clinical trials and encourage physicians to further optimize treatment of their patients in clinical practice.

1. McInnes IB, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:16–7.
2. Mease PJ, et al. Rheumatol Ther 2021 [Epub ahead of print].

Figure 1. Predictors of Achievement of MDA at Week 56 with Upadacitinib 15 mg – Evaluated Simultaneously. *p < 0.05. c-statistics: 0.6 indicates a fair model, 0.7 indicates a good model, and 0.8 indicates a strong model. Non-responder imputation was used for MDA at Week 56. bDMARD, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; F, female; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; IR, inadequate responder; LDI, Leeds Dactylitis Index; M, male; MDA, minimal disease activity; OR, odds ratio; PhGA, Physician’s Global Assessment; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; PtGA, Patient’s Global Assessment; Pt-Pain, Patient’s Assessment of Pain.

Figure 2. Predictors of Achievement of DAPSA LDA at Week 56 with Upadacitinib 15 mg – Evaluated Simultaneously. *p < 0.05. c-statistics: 0.6 indicates a fair model, 0.7 indicates a good model, and 0.8 indicates a strong model. Non-responder imputation was used for DAPSA LDA at Week 56. bDMARD, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAPSA, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis; F, female; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; IR, inadequate responder; LDA, low disease activity; LDI, Leeds Dactylitis Index; M, male; OR, odds ratio; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; Pt-Pain, Patient’s Assessment of Pain; TJC68, tender joint count in 68 joints.


Disclosures: D. Aletaha, AbbVie, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Medac, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6; P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2; R. Lippe, AbbVie, 3, 11; F. Behrens, Chugai, 5, 6, AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 6, Celgene, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Merck, 6, Novartis, 6, Sanofi, 6, UCB, 6; D. Haaland, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Adiga Life Sciences, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Can-Fite BioPharma, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Regeneron, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Merck, 6, Takeda, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6; P. Palominos, AbbVie, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; A. Lertratanakul, AbbVie, 3, 11; M. Lane, AbbVie, 3, 11; K. Douglas, AbbVie, 3, 11; P. Nash, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6, Gilead/Galapagos, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Samsung, 2, 5, 6; A. Kavanaugh, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aletaha D, Mease P, Lippe R, Behrens F, Haaland D, Palominos P, Lertratanakul A, Lane M, Douglas K, Nash P, Kavanaugh A. Predictors for Achievement of Low Disease Activity at Week 56 in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Who Received Upadacitinib 15 Mg Once Daily: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-for-achievement-of-low-disease-activity-at-week-56-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-who-received-upadacitinib-15-mg-once-daily-pooled-analysis-of-two-phase-3-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-for-achievement-of-low-disease-activity-at-week-56-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-who-received-upadacitinib-15-mg-once-daily-pooled-analysis-of-two-phase-3-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology