ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2460

Predictive Factors of Good Response to Conventional Dmards in Patients with Early Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Espoir Cohort

JULIA MARY1, B Combe2, Cédric Lukas3 and Michel De Bandt4, 1RHEUMATOLOGY, CHU Fort de France, 97261, Martinique, 2Immuno-Rhumatologie, CHU Lapeyronie, University of Montpellier, France, 3Rheumatology, CHU Lapeyronie and EA2415, Montpellier University, University of Montpellier, France, 4Rheumatology department, CHU Fort de France, Fort de France, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: DMARDs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster III: Treatment – Monitoring, Outcomes, Adverse Events

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Early seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a separate entity. Less is known about its initial clinical presentation and outcome due to the difficulty in identification among patients with undifferentiated arthritis. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of good response to conventional DMARDs in seronegative RA patients in the ESPOIR cohort.

Methods:  Patients from the ESPOIR cohort with an early seronegative RA fulfilling the ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria were included. Primary endpoint was a good or moderate EULAR response evaluated at one year, after at least three months of treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Secondary objectives were to compare the early therapeutic response to methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) versus other csDMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine), and to identify factors associated with functional disability (HAQ-DI > 0.5 at one year) and structural progression (modified total Sharp score > 1 and >5 points at one year). A Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Student or Mann Whitney tests for quantitative variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of outcome in multivariate analysis.

Results: 172 patients were analyzed: 81% women, mean age of 49.5+12.8 years. Mean DAS28 was 5.5+1.1 at baseline. 57% of patients were then treated with MTX. csDMARDs instituted early, i.e. within three months following the first joint swelling was significantly associated with EULAR good or moderate response at one year (OR = 2.41 95% CI [1.07- 5.42] p = 0.03) on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Observed response rates were neither influenced by the type of first line csDMARDs (MTX vs other DMARDs), nor by other classical prognostic factors. Presence of erosions at baseline was significantly associated with progression of the Sharp score > 1 point (p = 0.03) and > 5 points (p = 0.03) at one year. HAQ ≥1 at inclusion and active smoking were significantly associated with an HAQ > 0.5 at one year.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that more than baseline clinical, biological or imaging features, it is the delay in initiation of csDMARD that greatly affects the outcome in patients with early seronegative RA.


Disclosure: J. MARY, None; B. Combe, None; C. Lukas, None; M. De Bandt, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

MARY J, Combe B, Lukas C, De Bandt M. Predictive Factors of Good Response to Conventional Dmards in Patients with Early Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Espoir Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictive-factors-of-good-response-to-conventional-dmards-in-patients-with-early-seronegative-rheumatoid-arthritis-data-from-the-espoir-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictive-factors-of-good-response-to-conventional-dmards-in-patients-with-early-seronegative-rheumatoid-arthritis-data-from-the-espoir-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology