ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3092

Predictive Factors for Better Outcome of Switching of Biologics for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Daily Clinical Practice

Kazuyoshi Saito1, Kazuhisa Nakano2, Shingo Nakayamada3, Satoshi Kubo4, Ippei Miyagawa1, Shigeru Iwata5 and Yoshiya Tanaka6, 1University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2The First department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 4The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 5First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 6University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics, clinical practice and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy IV: Biomarkers

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:  Eight biologics have been approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. However, little is known regarding what to do when patients have an inadequate response to first biologics in daily clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of biologics as 2nd-line use in RA patients in daily clinical practice from our university cohort (FIRST registry).

Methods:  We retrospectively examined more than 2500 patients who were treated with biologics in our institute between July 2003 and December 2015. We compared the effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors (TNFi), TCZ, ABA as 2nd-line use and efficacy of switching from 1st TNFi to 2nd TNFi, TCZ or ABA based on CDAI and biomarkers such as CRP, ESR and MMP3, IL-6 (LOCF). Propensity score (PS) were generated using multinomial logistic regression and the study groups were matched regarding baseline variables including age, disease duration, disease activity, concomitant use of MTX and PSL. In addition, in order to find out the characteristic of 2nd biologics, we conducted comparison between the upper (1yCDAI-H; low response) and lower (1yCDAI-L; good response) quartiles in CDAI at 1 y after switching.

Results:  In terms of switching of biologics, CDAI at 1year was comparable among TCZ(n=141), 2ndTNFi(n=186)and ABT(n=91) after the adjustment by PS. Interestingly, comparison between the upper (1yCDAI-H) and lower (1yCDAI-L) quartiles in CDAI at 1 y after switching revealed that disease activity might improve despite of a high disease activity at switching in the case of TCZ. In addition, higher CRP, MMP-3 at switching were predictive factors for better outcome despite of higher RF factor in the case of switching to TCZ. Titer of Serum IL-6 but not TNF was markedly elevated in patients showed better outcome. In contrast, ABT showed a lower efficacy especially in the patients with RF low, CRP high. (Figure).

Conclusion:  After adjustment using PS-score, RA patients with prior anti-TNF exposures had similar outcomes after switching. Our results imply us that CRP, MMP3 and RF titer at switching gives us important information for switching. Of note, higher CRP or MMP-3, suggesting inadequate suppression of IL-6 by first biologics, might predict better outcome of TCZ.

Figure: CDAI 1 year after switching biologics categorized by titer of CRP and RF at switching (cut off titer was defined using ROC curve)


Disclosure: K. Saito, None; K. Nakano, None; S. Nakayamada, None; S. Kubo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5; I. Miyagawa, None; S. Iwata, None; Y. Tanaka, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, AbbVie, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2,UCB Pharma, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbott, AbbVie, Eisai, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Quintiles, MSD, Asahi Kasei, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saito K, Nakano K, Nakayamada S, Kubo S, Miyagawa I, Iwata S, Tanaka Y. Predictive Factors for Better Outcome of Switching of Biologics for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Daily Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictive-factors-for-better-outcome-of-switching-of-biologics-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-daily-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictive-factors-for-better-outcome-of-switching-of-biologics-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-daily-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology