ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1590

Post-Operative Rehabilitation Provides Unmet Need for Better Patient Support and Advice Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Michael V. Hurley1, James Greenwood2 and Dr Nicola E. Walsh3, 1School of Rehabilitation Sciences, St George's University of London and Kingston University, London, United Kingdom, 2Physiotherapy, University College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom, 3Allied Health Professions, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rehabilitation

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: In the absence of evidence-based post-operative rehabilitation, following fusion surgery for severe persistent low back pain, people receive advice to rest for 3 months then progressively resume normal function. Such unclear, generic advice is unhelpful, and post-operative recovery may be delayed or suboptimal. We introduced a structured post-operative rehabilitation program of individualised progressive exercise and self-management advice for people who had undergone lumbar fusion. We wanted to evaluate how helpful participants found the program.

Methods: 15 patients attending follow-up appointments were asked about their concerns, experiences, perceptions and needs. 4 patients on the program (small group, once a week for 10 weeks) were asked if and how the program helped them. The main themes that emerged were documented.

Results:

Patients primarily reported concerns about musculoskeletal or psychosocial issues rather than technical surgical problems, e.g. residual pain and disability, how to reduce analgesia, when to resume certain activities, etc, but complained of a lack of advice and support. The program enabled access to a healthcare professional who could fully address people’s concerns “…my GP said to ask my consultant but I never get to see him, so it is great that I can ask you…”

Four areas raised most concerns:

Residual symptoms: People didn’t know what to expect and presence of residual symptoms concerned them “…if the operation was a success why do I still have pain…”

Prognosis: They wanted to know what would happen “…will this metalwork wear out…will it have to come out…”. The program allowed them to ask questions and learn from others “…I am glad to hear that exercise will not cause my spine to wear out. The others in the class have helped me see that I can get better…”

Physical function: People were keen to return to more normal physical function but were unsure what to do, how and when “…they told me to gradually increase my activity, but which activity and when…”

Co-morbidity: People were unclear how co-morbidity might affect outcome “…how does my diabetes affect exercise…” “…my neck hurts as well…” but advice was lacking, unhelpful or impractical. The program gave individuals specific advice and they experienced benefits first-hand “…the consultant just kept telling me to walk, but my knee hurt and I was scared. It is so helpful that you can help me manage all of these problems…”

Conclusion: There is a need for better support to answer concerns that cause distress, anxiety and may impede post-operative recovery. Surgeons are primarily concerned about infection, implant failure, etc. Our post-operative rehabilitation program improved access to healthcare professionals who gave advice and support that might improve outcome. The program warrants more thorough evaluation.


Disclosure:

M. V. Hurley,
None;

J. Greenwood,
None;

D. N. E. Walsh,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/post-operative-rehabilitation-provides-unmet-need-for-better-patient-support-and-advice-following-lumbar-spinal-fusion/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology