ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 169

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance Data Reveals Patterns of Use for Pegloticase in Refractory Chronic Gout

Kenneth M. Bahrt1, Anthony E. Yeo2, Tina L. Howson3 and Faith D. Ottery1, 1Medical Affairs, Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., East Brunswick, NJ, 2Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., East Brunswick, NJ, 3Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: hyperuricemia and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase is a recombinant modified mammalian uricase conjugated to mPEG which was approved in the US in 2010 for treating hyperuricemia in patients with refractory chronic gout. The pegloticase development program comprised 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (6 months; N=212) followed by an open-label extension study for a total treatment duration of up to 3 years. Trial entry was preceded by a 1 week washout period for urate-lowering therapies. Patients were considered “responders” if they met the primary efficacy endpoint of uric acid (UA) <6 mg/dL for 80% of time during months 3 and 6. 42% of patients met this definition (vs. 0% with placebo; p<0.001) in the randomized trials1.

 Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant relationship between a loss of urate-lowering response to therapy and the presence of high titer anti-pegloticase antibodies. Loss of response was also associated with increased risk of infusion reactions (IRs). Further analyses confirmed that the great majority of IRs occurred in patients who had already lost their urate-lowering response to therapy (20/22 or 91% for patients receiving pegloticase 8 mg q2wks and 24/34 or 71% for patients treated q4wks). These two findings led to clear guidance that patients treated with pegloticase should discontinue treatment if UA levels rose above 6 mg/dL (particularly with 2 consecutive levels >6 mg/dL). New information provided by post-marketing pharmacovigilance suggests a relationship between serum UA levels <6 mg/dL, IRs and concomitant use of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs).

Methods: Post-marketing AE data were collected as standard, unsolicited reporting and summarized from September 14, 2010 to November 30, 2011 to evaluate concomitant XOI use.

Results: During approximately one year of commercial pegloticase use in the US, IRs were reported in 20 patients and anaphylaxis in 8 patients. Among the reports of IRs, 8 patients had UA >6, 7 had UA <6 and UA was unknown at the time of the IR in 5. Among the reports of anaphylaxis, 4 patients had UA levels >6, 2 had UA levels <6 and 2 had unknown UA. Importantly, AE reporting revealed that 40% of patients (8/20 IRs and 3/8 cases recorded as anaphylaxis) were receiving one or both XOIs in addition to pegloticase. Details of these 11 patients are provided in the table.

Conclusion: Post-marketing adverse event reporting provided valuable information regarding pegloticase administration in the real world setting. Importantly, the use of concomitant urate-lowering therapies has the potential to mask the rise of UA levels in patients treated with pegloticase and confound the use of UA as a biomarker of response. XOIs should be discontinued prior to initiation of pegloticase and not restarted while on treatment. Further, UA monitoring and discontinuation of pegloticase upon loss of efficacy are critical to safe and effective care.

1. Sundy et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-20.

Patients with infusion reactions receiving concomitant XOIs

ID

SUA on XOI

Infusion #

Previous SUA

Demographic

Patient A

8.2 mg/dL on febuxostat

3rd

Previous infusion 5-6 mg/dL range

Caucasian male, unspecified age

Patient B

3.4 mg/dL on febuxostat

2nd

4.1 mg/dL at baseline on febuxostat

87 year old (yo) white male

Patient C

9.5 mg/dL on febuxostat

3rd

Previous 4.5 mg/dL prior to 2nd infusion

49 yo Caucasian male

Patient D

undetectable on febuxostat

3rd

Previous very low (unspecified)

57 yo Caucasian male

Patient E

8.6 mg/dL on allopurinol

4th

Previous 5.2 mg/dL prior to 3rd infusion

55 yo Caucasian male

Patient F

6.8 mg/dL on allopurinol

3rd

Previous 1.3 prior to 2nd infusion

31 yo male, of unknown origin

Patient G

5.5 mg/dL on both XOIs

3rd  or 4th

Previous 5.3 mg/dL

38 yo Caucasian male

Patient H

7.4 mg/dL on both XOIs

3rd

Previous 4.6 mg/dL prior to 2nd infusion

42 yo African-American male

Patients with anaphylaxis receiving concomitant XOIs

ID

SUA on XOI

Infusion #

Previous SUA

Demographic

Patient  I  

6.7 mg/dL on allopurinol

3rd

Previous 7.6 mg/dL but had missed appt

58 yo white male

Patient J

4.3 mg/dL on allopurinol

2nd

Previous 4.3 mg/dL prior to 2nd

60 yo white male

Patient K

7.1 mg/dL on febuxostat

3rd

Previous <0.5 prior to ?2nd infusion

47 yo white male


Disclosure:

K. M. Bahrt,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

1,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3;

A. E. Yeo,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

1,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3;

T. L. Howson,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

1,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3;

F. D. Ottery,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

3,

Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

1.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/post-marketing-safety-surveillance-data-reveals-patterns-of-use-for-pegloticase-in-refractory-chronic-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology