ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 865

Poor Predictive Value of Isolated Adventitial and Periadventitial Infiltrates in Temporal Artery Biopsies for Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

Claire Le Pendu1, Véronique Meignin2, Solange Gonzalez-Chiappe3, Françoise Galateau-Sallé4 and Alfred Mahr3, 1Internal Medicine, Hospital Saint Louis, PARIS, France, 2Pathology, Saint Louis Hospital, PARIS, France, 3Internal Medicine, Hospital Saint-Louis, Paris, France, 4Pathology, Caen Hospital, Caen, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: giant cell arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Vasculitis - Poster I: Large Vessel Vasculitis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Histological findings of intima-media or transmural inflammation in temporal artery biopsies (TABs) have undisputed high value for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Conversely, the diagnostic significance of isolated adventitial or periadventitial cell infiltrates (e.g., inflammation limited to the adventitia [ILA], vasa vasorum vasculitis [VVV], and small vessel vasculitis [SVV]) remains unclear. We investigated the diagnostic value of isolated ILA, VVV or SVV in TABs for GCA and for the combined GCA/polymyalgia rheumatica (GCA/PMR) spectrum because of the close clinical connection of GCA and PMR.

Methods: All TABs performed in a single center over 7 years (2009–2015) were independently reviewed by 2 experienced pathologists blinded to the clinical diagnoses and with particular attention to isolated (peri)adventitial cell infiltrates. VVV was defined as a perivascular infiltrate within or in close contact with the adventitia and SVV as infiltrates of a periadventitial vessel. Medical charts were reviewed and diagnoses were classified as GCA, PMR and other by the final clinical diagnosis, with a follow-up of at least 6 months, as the gold standard. For TABs that did not show a classical histological picture of GCA with intima-media or transmural inflammation, we calculated the specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of ILA, VVV or SVV for GCA and for GCA/PMR diagnoses. These variables were calculated for findings observed by at least 1 or by both pathologists. Cohen’s kappa statistics were used to measure inter-observer agreement.

Results: We analyzed TABs for 100 patients; 6 were discarded because they did not allow for proper morphologic analysis of all vessel layers and 19 had classical histological features of GCA. For the remaining 75 TABs (mean age of patients, 69±12 years, 59% female), the diagnosis was GCA (n=8), PMR (n=7) and non-GCA/PMR (n=60). The frequency of (peri)adventitial TAB findings and their respective specificities and PPV for clinical diagnosis of GCA or GCA/PMR are in the Table. Inter-observer agreement was good for ILA (kappa 0.63 [95% CI 0.42–0.84]) and fair for SVV (0.31 [95% CI 0.09–0.52]) and VVV (0.21 [95% CI -0.01–0.43]).  

 

GCA (n=8) vs. non-GCA (n=67)

GCA/PMR (n=15) vs. non-GCA/PMR (n=60)

 

Frequency

Spec (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

Frequency

Spec (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

ILA

 

 

 

 

 

 

At least 1 reader

2/8 vs. 10/67

85% (74–93)

17% (2–48)

4/15 vs. 8/60

87% (75–94)

33% (10–65)

Both readers

1/8 vs. 5/67

93%(84–96)

17% (0–64)

1/15 vs. 5/60

92% (82–97)

17% (0–64)

VVV

 

 

 

 

 

 

At least 1 reader

0/8 vs. 7/67

90% (80–96)

0% (0–41)

0/15 vs. 7/60

88% (77–95)

0% (0–41)

Both readers

0/8 vs. 1/67

99% (92–100)

0% (0–98)

0/15 vs. 1/60

98% (91–100)

0% (0–98)

SVV

 

 

 

 

 

 

At least 1 reader

2/8 vs. 27/67

60% (47–72)

7% (1–23)

7/15 vs. 22/60

63% (50–75)

24% (10–44)

Both readers

1/8 vs. 8/67

88% (78–95)

11% (0–48)

4/15 vs. 5/60

92% (82–97)

44% (14–79)

ILA: isolated inflammation of the adventitia, PPV: positive predictive value, Spec: specificity, SVV: small vessel vasculitis, VVV: vasa vasorum vasculitis

Conclusion: Isolated (peri)adventitial infiltrates in a TAB do not reliably predict a diagnosis of GCA and should not be considered relevant GCA-defining histological criteria. More general consensus is needed on the histological criteria defining GCA.


Disclosure: C. Le Pendu, None; V. Meignin, None; S. Gonzalez-Chiappe, None; F. Galateau-Sallé, None; A. Mahr, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Le Pendu C, Meignin V, Gonzalez-Chiappe S, Galateau-Sallé F, Mahr A. Poor Predictive Value of Isolated Adventitial and Periadventitial Infiltrates in Temporal Artery Biopsies for Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-predictive-value-of-isolated-adventitial-and-periadventitial-infiltrates-in-temporal-artery-biopsies-for-diagnosis-of-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-predictive-value-of-isolated-adventitial-and-periadventitial-infiltrates-in-temporal-artery-biopsies-for-diagnosis-of-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology