ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0349

Pooled Safety Results from Two Phase-3 Trials of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Through 1 Year

Christopher Ritchlin1, Proton Rahman2, Philip Helliwell3, Wolf-Henning Boehncke4, Iain McInnes5, Alice Gottlieb6, Shelly Kafka7, Alexa Kollmeier8, Elizabeth Hsia9, Xie Xu10, May Shawi11, Shihong Sheng12, Prasheen Agarwal12, Bei Zhou12, Paraneedharan Ramachandran13 and Philip Mease14, 1Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 2Memorial University of Newfoundland, Department of Medicine, St John's, Canada, 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, 5Institute of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 6Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 7Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 9Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 10Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 11Janssen Global Services, LLC, Toronto, ON, Canada, 12Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 13Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Horsham, 14Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: DISCOVER 1 & 2, two double-blind, phase 3, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) trials of guselkumab (GUS, an IL-23 inhibitor), demonstrated significant improvement with GUS vs placebo (PBO) in signs and symptoms of PsA, with good tolerability, at week (w) 24 during the PBO-controlled period.1,2 Beyond w24, all patients switched to GUS. Continued treatment maintained efficacy through w52.3,4 Here, we describe pooled safety results from the DISCOVER 1 & 2 trials through 1-year of GUS treatment.

Methods: Adults with active PsA (≥3 tender/swollen joints and C-Reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL in DISCOVER 1; ≥5 tender/swollen joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL in DISCOVER 2)­ were enrolled. Patients were biologic naive except ~30% patients in DISCOVER 1 had taken 1-2 TNF inhibitors. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous GUS 100 mg at w0, w4, then every 8 w (q8w); GUS 100 mg q4w; or PBO. At w24, PBO patients were switched to GUS 100 mg q4w. Adverse events (AEs), laboratory investigations, and AEs of interest (Table 3) through w60 (end of trial) in DISCOVER 1 and through w52 in DISCOVER 2 were reported.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups in the pooled studies (Table 1). Through w24 and 1 year, time adjusted results (per 100 patient years [PY]) for numbers of patients with ≥1 event were similar among treatment groups for AEs, serious AEs, infections, serious infections, and discontinuations due to an AE (Table 2). For events of interest at 1 year (Table 3), there were no cases of active tuberculosis or opportunistic infections (including Candida); no inflammatory bowel disease in GUS-treated patients; 2 deaths in PBO patients; and low incidences that were similar across treatment groups for malignancy, major adverse cardiac events, and injection-site reactions. Incidence of anti-GUS antibodies was 4.5%, and most were not neutralizing. Mild elevations in serum hepatic transaminases and decreases in neutrophil counts were consistent at 1 year with the results at w24 (Table 3).

Conclusion: GUS regimens of q8w and q4w were well tolerated in PsA patients through 1 year of treatment in the phase 3 DISCOVER trials, consistent with the w24 results. There were no meaningful differences between incidences of AEs reported in the q8w and q4w groups. The safety profile of GUS in PsA patients is generally comparable with the previously established safety profile of GUS.

References:

  1. Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115.
  2. Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126.
  3. Ritchlin C et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0397.
  4. McInnes I et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0402.


Disclosure: C. Ritchlin, None; P. Rahman, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Abbott, 8, Centacor, 8, Merck, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Roche, 5; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, Pfizer Inc, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 2, UCB, 8; W. Boehncke, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, 5; I. McInnes, Novartis, 9, AbbVie, 9, Celgene, 9, Janssen, 2, 9, UCB, 2, 9, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 9, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Lilly, 9, LEO, 9; A. Gottlieb, Janssen, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Xbiotech, 2, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Beiersdorf, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 5, Avotres Therapeutics, 5; S. Kafka, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; B. Zhou, Janssen Reserach & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Ramachandran, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1, 3; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Helliwell P, Boehncke W, McInnes I, Gottlieb A, Kafka S, Kollmeier A, Hsia E, Xu X, Shawi M, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Ramachandran P, Mease P. Pooled Safety Results from Two Phase-3 Trials of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Through 1 Year [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pooled-safety-results-from-two-phase-3-trials-of-guselkumab-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-through-1-year/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pooled-safety-results-from-two-phase-3-trials-of-guselkumab-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-through-1-year/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology